Solving Hermitian Conjugate Homework

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving homework problems related to Hermitian conjugates of operators. For part (a), it is established that the adjoint of the adjoint of an operator equals the operator itself, confirming that both operators share the same domain. In part (b), the expression for the Hermitian conjugate of a linear combination of operators is derived, showing that it involves the complex conjugates of the coefficients and the adjoints of the individual operators. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful notation and derivation steps in proving these properties. Overall, the participants are working through the mathematical definitions and relationships of Hermitian operators.
v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a.) Show \hat {(Q^\dagger)}^\dagger=\hat Q, where \hat {Q^\dagger} is defined by <\alpha| \hat Q \beta>= <\hat Q^ \dagger \alpha|\beta>.

b.) For \hat Q =c_1 \hat A + c_2 \hat B, show its Hermitian conjugate is \hat Q^\dagger =c_1^* \hat A^\dagger + c_2^* \hat B^\dagger.


Homework Equations



a.) I found an example that might be related to this problem. It says that |T^\dagger \alpha> = T^\dagger |\alpha> and <T|=(|T>)^\dagger .





The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), I'm thinking that I might be rewrite the right hand side of the second equation. From the relevant equations I gave, do you think <\hat Q^\dagger \alpha| \beta> = \hat Q^\dagger <\alpha| \beta> is permitted? And if so, how do I proceed from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For both a) and b) assume the operators are bounded, hence domains issues do not appear. So for point a) both the adjoint and the adjoint of the adjoint exist and share the same domain,

\langle \psi, Q\phi\rangle = \langle Q^{\dagger}\psi,\phi\rangle = ...

For point b), use the definition of adjoint used at a).
 
Here is my attempt after your advice:

(a) <\alpha|\hat Q \beta>=<\alpha| \hat Q^{\dagger \dagger} \beta>

(b) <\hat Q^* \alpha| \beta>=<\hat Q^{\dagger} \alpha|\beta>

I'm not exactly sure about the intermediate steps i.e. from 'first principle' to derive these equations.
 
Ok, in my writing above instead of ... there's what you've written (with other vectors, and with LaTex write \langle and \rangle to get nicely looking eqns)

So

\langle \psi,Q\phi\rangle = \langle \psi,Q^{\dagger\dagger}\phi\rangle from where you have that both the range and the domain of Q and Q double dagger are equal, hence the 2 operators are equal. q.e.d.

For point b) pay more attention with your writings and redo your calculations.
 
Is this correct?

\langle\alpha|\hat Q \beta \rangle=\hat Q \langle \alpha| \beta \rangle <br /> = \langle\hat Q^* \alpha| \beta \rangle

Therefore,

\langle\hat Q^* \alpha| \beta \rangle = \langle \hat Q^\dagger \alpha |\beta \rangle

If the above is correct, I get:

\hat Q^\dagger = \hat Q^* = c_1^* \hat A + c_2^* \hat B

But I don't get the \dagger above the A and the B.
 
Not really.

\langle \psi,(c_1 A + c_2 B)\phi\rangle = \langle (c_1 A + c_2 B)^{\dagger}\psi, \phi\rangle = \langle \psi,c_1 A \phi\rangle + \langle \psi,c_2 B \phi\rangle.

Can you go further with the sequence of equalities ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K