Solving Hess's Law Problem for ΔH of Formation of Hematite

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the enthalpy of formation for hematite (Fe2O3) at 1200K using Hess's Law and integrating heat capacities over a specified temperature range.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate the constant pressure heat capacity function of hematite from 298K to 1200K and questions whether to add the enthalpy of formation at 298K to their calculated value. Other participants inquire about the specifics of the integration and the implications of Hess's Law.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationship between the enthalpy changes at different temperatures and the definition of enthalpy of formation. There is an emphasis on clarifying the distinction between the calculated enthalpy change and the absolute enthalpy of formation.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the integration of heat capacities across different states of hematite and the need to understand the implications of Hess's Law in the context of the problem.

ice87
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So I'm taking Thermodynamics I in university. I'm just doing the homework now, and there is something that i don't really understand.

To get the Enthalpy of formation for hematite (Fe2O3) at 1200K, I first integrated the constant pressure heat capacity function over the temperature range from 298K to 1200K, then added the heats of transformation across this temperature range. but now, at the end, should the enthalpy of formation at 298K be added to the number that i found?

=> integrating over from 298K to 1200K, and adding the heat of transformation for hematite: I got this number: 129300J/mol

=> ΔH of formation at 298K is given as -821300J/mol, should i add these two numbers together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You integrated the heat capacities of what from 298 - 1200? Hess's Law.
 
roughly speaking I integrated the C_p function of Fe2O3 - hematite from 298 to 1200.
I really integrated it three times, because hematite has 3 states in this temperature range, and the C_p function for each state is different.
 
Okay, that gives you the difference in enthalpy between hematite at 298 and 1200, right? Says nothing about absolute or standard enthalpy of formation of hematite at either temperature. Enthalpy of formation is defined as the enthalpy change when the compound is formed from the elements at their standard states at the same temperature. You are looking for the enthalpy of formation of hematite at 1200 K, the enthalpy change you would observe if you combined oxygen and iron to form hematite at 1200 K. What you have is the enthalpy change for heating hematite from 298 to 1200 and the enthalpy of formation of hematite at 298. Read the section on Hess's Law again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
27K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K