Solving Holomorphic Function: Is f(z) Differentiable at z_0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(z) = (\bar{z})^2 is not holomorphic in the complex plane \mathbb{C} as it fails to satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations except at the origin (0,0). At this point, the function is differentiable, yielding a derivative of f'(z) = 0. However, since holomorphicity requires the function to be differentiable in an open set, f(z) cannot be classified as holomorphic at the origin. The discussion clarifies the distinction between differentiability and holomorphicity in complex analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Knowledge of limits and derivatives in complex analysis
  • Basic concepts of holomorphic functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations in complex analysis
  • Learn about the definition and properties of holomorphic functions
  • Explore the concept of complex derivatives and their applications
  • Investigate Taylor series expansions for complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in the properties of holomorphic functions and their differentiability.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
Is f(z) = [itex](\bar{z})^2[/itex] holomorphic in [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex]? Is it differentiable in the complex sense at any point [itex]z_0 \in \mathbb{C}[/itex]? If it is, find [itex]f’(z_0)[/itex].

for the first part i said it was not holomorphic on the whole complex plane as [itex]f(z)=(x-iy)^2=x^2-2ixy-y^2=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)[/itex]

and so [itex]\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}=2x,\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{y}}=-2y,\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{x}}=-2y,\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{y}}=-2x[/itex] meaning the Cauchy Riemann equations are not satisfied unless [itex](x,y)=(0,0)[/itex] i.e. it is holomorphic at the origin of the copmlex plane and therefore it may be differentiable at this point - this leads us to the next part of the question.

so for f to be differentiable at a particular [itex]z_0 \in \mathbb{C}[/itex] it must be holomorphic at that point, let us investigate what happens at [itex]z_0=(0,0)[/itex]

[itex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{f(z_0+h)-f(z_0)}{h} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{f(h)}{h}=\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{\bar{h}^2}{h} \rightarrow 0[/itex].
now as this limit exists, f must be differentiable at 0

the derivative is given by [itex]f'(z)=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}+i \frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{x}}=0[/itex]

i'm a little uncertain of the final answer so would like someone to check over my working if possible. cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, the complex differential exists only at the origin and it is 0. By the way, since you alread computed the partial derivatives and found the Cauchy-Riemann equations to be satisfied at 0, this already implies that the complex derivative (i.e. the limit of the difference quotient) exists at 0.

However, the definition of "holomorphic" requires an open set U of the complex plane and the complex derivative to exists for all points in U. Otherwise the familiar properties, like existence and convergence of the taylor series, would fail. So it does not make sense to say that f is holomorphic at the origin, since a single point is not open.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K