Solving integral using residue theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the integral ∫ x^2/(((x^2 + 4)^2)(x^2+9)) dx from 0 to infinity, utilizing the residue theorem. The original poster notes that the function is even, suggesting a potential simplification by considering the integral from -∞ to ∞.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses the singularities in the upper half-plane and expresses difficulty in calculating the residue at the pole 2i, questioning the methods attempted. Some participants clarify that 2i is a second-order pole and provide the residue formula for such poles.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the calculation of residues, particularly at the second-order pole 2i. Guidance has been provided regarding the appropriate residue formula, and there is a verification of the calculations being performed by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working under the assumption that the integral can be evaluated using complex analysis techniques, specifically the residue theorem, and is navigating the complexities of higher-order poles.

arpitm08
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the value of ∫ x^2/(((x^2 + 4)^2)(x^2+9)) dx. With the limits from 0 to infinity.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that this is an even function so we can calculate the value of the integral from -∞ to ∞ and just divide by 2. The upper half plane singularities are 3i and 2i and 2i. I calculated the residue for 3i, but couldn't figure out a way to calculate it for 2i. I tried to take the derivate of the denominator, but if you plug in 2i into that, you would get 0. I tried other ways, but they only resulted in negative answers. Is there a way that I'm not thinking of to find the residue at 2i? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pole at ##z = 2i## is not a simple pole, so you have to use the residue formula for nth order poles. If a function f(z) has a pole of order n at z0, then

$$Res(f,z_0) = \lim_{z\rightarrow z_0} \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}\left[(z-z_0)^n f(z) \right]$$
 
Mute said:
The pole at ##z = 2i## is not a simple pole, so you have to use the residue formula for nth order poles. If a function f(z) has a pole of order n at z0, then

$$Res(f,z_0) = \lim_{z\rightarrow z_0} \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}\left[(z-z_0)^n f(z) \right]$$

It's a 2nd order pole. I took the derivative of h(x) = f(x)*(x-2i)^2. Then h(2i)=-13 * i / 200. Is that right?
 
Last edited:
arpitm08 said:
It's a 2nd order pole. I took the derivative of h(x) = f(x)*(x-2i)^2. Then h(2i)=-13 * i / 200. Is that right?

Yes, it is. Well done!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K