Solving integration by parts using derivatives vs differentials?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between solving integration by parts using derivatives versus differentials. Participants explore the perceived complexity and elegance of each approach, particularly in the context of a specific integral problem.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their method of solving the integral ∫xsin(x) dx using integration by parts with differentials, expressing confusion over criticism received for this approach.
  • Another participant suggests that the criticism may stem from a belief that using differentials is more difficult and that derivatives are a more elegant choice.
  • A participant argues that both methods are valid and that the length of a solution does not determine its quality, emphasizing that valid arguments should be prioritized over preferences for brevity.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in their notation, which may have contributed to the criticism, but maintains that both methods are acceptable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity and elegance of using derivatives versus differentials in integration by parts. There is no consensus on which method is superior or more appropriate.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the use of notation, such as the inclusion of "dx," can influence perceptions of difficulty, but this remains a subjective aspect of the discussion.

thepatient
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
What is the difference? I was pretty bored last night so I got onto Yahoo Answers and answered a few calculus questions. It was a simple integration by parts question:

[itex]\int[/itex]xsin(x) dx

I solved as:
u = x
du = dx

dv = sin(x) dx
v = -cos(x)

uv - [itex]\int[/itex]vdu
-xcos(x) + [itex]\int[/itex]cos(x)dx = sin(x) - xcos(x) + c


I later got a thumbs down by a second answerer, saying that solving using differentials is much more difficult to do, and that it's preferable to answer using derivatives.

I don't understand. I mean, I know how to solve using derivatives and functions instead of differentials, but how is it more difficult, and how is it the wrong approach? It just kept bugging me all night since I have always solved in this form and never thought it was wrong or difficult. There is no big difference solving with functions either:

[itex]\int[/itex] f'(x)g(x) dx = f(x)g(x) - [itex]\int[/itex]f(x)g'(x)dx

Only that you choose for a function and a derivative of a function. Am I missing something fundamental? Maybe I'm being too sensitive. I don't like getting thumbs down when I know I did something right. :( lol Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the person who* thumbed you down wasn't sane lol
 
Last edited:
I didn't thumb him down, he thumbed me down because I used a "more difficult approach". :( I believed him since he is a "top contributor", but I don't see how it's a more difficult approach. I just really feel I'm missing something.

I rarely thumb down. Only used it for things that don't answer a question, spam, trolls and very very very bad answers. XD
 
It was a typo xP
I believe both work well. And in mathematics it's useless to talk about preferred arguments I think. we got valid and invalid arguments. if your argument is valid, then who cares if there is an easier valid argument? both methods work fine and just because one method is few lines longer it doesn't make it an inferior or less preferred method.
I also like easy and beautiful proofs. but it doesn't mean that if you prove something in a way that someone doesn't prefer it he should thumb you down.
 
Ah... I messaged him and found out why he said such thing.. Apparently it is more difficult because you might forget the dx on the notation. And using functions and derivatives is more elegant, according to him. I didn't argue. I looked at my answer and did make a mistake on the notation and added an extra dx accidentally. Just a typo. XD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K