Solving Laplace Equation with Boundary Conditions: Is it Wrong?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the Laplace equation, specifically \(\nabla^2 u(r,\theta) = 0\), with boundary conditions defined as \(u(1,\theta) = u(2,\theta) = \sin^2 \theta\). Participants express concerns about the validity of the boundary conditions and the appropriateness of the coordinate system used for the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the feasibility of the boundary conditions and their implications for solutions in different coordinate systems. There are discussions about the general solutions in spherical versus plane polar coordinates and how to express \(\sin^2 \theta\) in terms of trigonometric identities.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants questioning the setup and expressing confusion about the boundary conditions. Some guidance is offered regarding the general forms of solutions and the use of trigonometric identities, but there is no clear consensus on the validity of the problem as stated.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential error in the boundary conditions as presented in the exam, and participants are grappling with the implications of using different coordinate systems for the solution.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
Does

[tex]\nabla ^2 u(r,\theta) = 0[/tex]

with the boundary conditions

[tex]u(1,\theta) = u(2,\theta) = \sin^2 \theta[/tex]

have any solutions?

This was a problem on my exam but someone must have written the conditions wrong, or am I stupid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not? It's a well-defined, well-behaved boundary condition over an enclosed space (the region between two concentric spheres).

The general solution in spherical coordinates is sum (Ai r^i + Bi / r^(i+1))Pi(cos theta). Plug in r=1 and r=2, and rewrite the sin^2 theta as 1 - cos^2 theta... then you only need the first few Legendre polynomials and you can solve for the coefficients.
 
But the problem is to be done in plane polar coordinates...?
 
Ah, right, sorry, I'm used to looking at these things in spherical coordinates... oh well, same wine, different bottle.

The general solutions look like A0 ln r + B0 + sum (Ai r^i + Bi / r^i)(Ci cos (i theta) + Di sin (i theta)). Use the double angle formula to get your cos^2 term.
 
How am I ever going to get [tex]u(2,\theta)[/tex], which contains an [tex]ln 2[/tex], to equal [tex]\sin^2 \theta[/tex]? And how can you possibly write [tex]\sin^2 \theta[/tex] as a linear combination of sin and cos?
 
Last edited:
[tex]\sin^{2}(\theta)=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\cos(2\theta)}{2}[/tex]
 
Logarythmic said:
How am I ever going to get [tex]u(2,\theta)[/tex], which contains an [tex]ln 2[/tex], to equal [tex]\sin^2 \theta[/tex]?

You aren't. Better set A0 = 0. :smile: And arildno already answered your other question.

Basically, you are free to choose any combination of the coefficients you need to match the boundary conditions. There are some integrals you can do to solve this analytically, but in most cases that you are likely to see in homework or on a test, you can just pick out the coefficients by inspection.
 
Damn it. I'm not worth those 4 points. ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K