MHB Solving Limit for Horizontal Asymtotes

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horizontal Limit
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
We had to solve this limit

$$\lim_{{x}\to{\infty}} \frac{1}{x}$$

the answer is y= 0 is the Horizontal Asymptotes. I get the y = 0 but how do we know that it is the horizontal asymptote?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know how rigorous of an argument you are looking for but it's important to note that horizontal asymptotes only occur when we are looking at limits as $x \rightarrow \infty$ or $x \rightarrow -\infty$. As you know they are a value that a graph is forever leaning towards but never really reaches. We can't directly solve for this limit like we can for many other ones, but we see the value it is tending towards.

The limit you posted is a very standard starting point for looking at horizontal asymptotes. You will see that there are some rules for calculating them that have to do with the degree of the numerator compared to the degree of the denominator.

Just to show you another example, if you look at:

$\displaystyle \lim_{{x}\to{\infty}} \frac{x}{x^2+1}$

the answer is also 0 since the denominator grows faster than the numerator. Anyway, can you tell me what kind of insight you are looking for specifically for the problem you gave and maybe I can better explain it? :)
 
Jameson said:
I don't know how rigorous of an argument you are looking for but it's important to note that horizontal asymptotes only occur when we are looking at limits as $x \rightarrow \infty$ or $x \rightarrow -\infty$. As you know they are a value that a graph is forever leaning towards but never really reaches. We can't directly solve for this limit like we can for many other ones, but we see the value it is tending towards.

The limit you posted is a very standard starting point for looking at horizontal asymptotes. You will see that there are some rules for calculating them that have to do with the degree of the numerator compared to the degree of the denominator.

Just to show you another example, if you look at:

$\displaystyle \lim_{{x}\to{\infty}} \frac{x}{x^2+1}$

the answer is also 0 since the denominator grows faster than the numerator. Anyway, can you tell me what kind of insight you are looking for specifically for the problem you gave and maybe I can better explain it? :)

Thanks I think that is what I needed to know, I was just confused by some of my notes from the lecture. How can you tell if a limit has Vertical Asymptotes?
 
Vertical asymptotes occur when you divide by 0 essentially. So if we use the example of: $$f(x)=\frac{1}{x}$$ there is one vertical asymptote at $x=\text{some value}$. Care to guess what that value is?
 
Jameson said:
Vertical asymptotes occur when you divide by 0 essentially. So if we use the example of: $$f(x)=frac{1}{x}$$ there is one vertical asymptote at $x=\text{some value}$. Care to guess what that value is?
When x = 0. Thanks, so if there is a vertical asymptote for a function, it occurs when the denominator is equal to 0?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top