Solving Linear Dependency: u,v,w Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the linear dependency or independence of three vectors: u = (1, -1, 2), v = (3, 0, 1), and w = (1, -2, 2). Participants are exploring matrix operations and the implications of echelon form in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up a matrix to analyze the vectors and seek to understand the conditions for linear independence. There are questions about the steps to take after reaching a certain echelon form, as well as inquiries about the definitions of rank and span.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on continuing the echelon form process and have raised questions about the relationship between the rank of the matrix and the linear independence of the vectors. Others express confusion about the definitions and implications of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information regarding the definitions of rank and span, as well as uncertainty about the matrix operations performed. Participants are also referencing external tools like Mathematica for verification.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Im a little confused here and I have a feeling I forgot how to do matrix operations. The problem is to determine whether or not the following equation is dependent or independent.

[tex]u = (1, - 1,2),v = (3,0,1),w = (1, - 2,2)[/tex]

I thought that I setup the matrix like this and try to look for the echelon form:

[tex]\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> 1 & 3 & 1 \\<br /> { - 1} & 0 & { - 2} \\<br /> 2 & 1 & 2 \\<br /> \end{array}[/tex]

I got it down to:

[tex]\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> 1 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> 0 & { - 5} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 3 & { - 1} \\<br /> \end{array}[/tex]

and I got a little confused, I am not sure what to do… or maybe I screwed up earlier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you really want to get it into echelon form, just continue! To get a 0 below that -5, multiply the second row by 3/5 and add to the third row.
Although, with that 0 in the second row, third column, it's already obvious, isn't it, that you will get a non-zero third row. That's enough to show these three vectors are not dependent.
 
Ok I'm still a little confused. What does the matrix have to become in order for me to be able to say its linear independent or linear independent?

I also ran the matrix through mathematica and it was able to reduce it to an identity matrix... did i maybe do the problem wrong?
 
The goal of the approach you are using is to find the dimension of the space your vectors span.

Can you use that number to tell if your vectors are linearly independent or not?

How does this number relate to the rank of the matrix you created?

What about the rank of the matrix produced by fully row-reducing it?

Can you tell what the rank of the fully row-reduced matrix is?
 
What do rank and span mean? I looked in the book and its farther into the book then the problem is.
 
If we call your matrix A, your vectors are linearly independent if and only if the only column vector X satisfying AX=0 is the zero vector. This is just the definition of linear independence as AX is just a linear combination of your vectors (the columns of A).

If you can reduce A to the identity matrix, what does this say about solutions to the homogeneous system AX=0?

If you are doubting your result, you might try "plotting" your vectors with a few pencils/straws/sticks/whatever. Do you know what linear independence will mean geometrically here?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K