Solving Mass of PF3 After Reaction: V=0.061L, T=-85C

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of phosphorus trifluoride (PF3) produced after a reaction involving solid phosphorus (P4) and fluorine gas (F2) in a closed container. Participants explore the implications of the reaction conditions, including volume, temperature, and pressure, while addressing uncertainties regarding the amounts of reactants and products.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the initial moles of F2 and attempts to find the moles of PF3 produced, expressing confusion over the stoichiometry of the reaction.
  • Another participant suggests that not all F2 reacted, prompting a reevaluation of the moles of each substance after the reaction.
  • Several participants discuss the need to account for both PF3 and unreacted F2 in the final calculations, leading to mixed interpretations of the stoichiometric relationships.
  • One participant proposes a method to express the relationship between the moles of PF3 and the moles of F2 that reacted, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the reaction's stoichiometry.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of writing equations that account for the moles of F2 and PF3, suggesting a system of equations to solve for the unknowns.
  • Participants engage in back-and-forth clarifications regarding the correct interpretation of the reaction and the calculations involved, with some expressing uncertainty about how to proceed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact amounts of reactants and products, as there are multiple competing views on how to interpret the stoichiometry and the resulting calculations. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing debate about the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the initial amounts of reactants and the implications of the reaction stoichiometry, leading to potential miscalculations. There are unresolved assumptions about the completeness of the reaction and the definitions of the variables involved.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
a container with a volume of 61cm3 is filled with gas F2 at a pressure of 250mmHg and a temp of -85 C. a small amount of solid P4 is put into the container and a reaction occurs according to

P4(s) + 6F2(g)--> 4PF3(g)

the container is again cooled to -85 C and the pressure is now measured at 203mmHg. find the mass of the PF3

V=0.061 L
T=188.15 K
Pi=0.329atm
Pf=0.267atm

now i don't know if all of the F reacted since i don't know how many mols of P there were so i can't just find the mols of F and multiply. but the most i could have is 2/3 the amount of mols of F2

using PV=nRT i can say that sincs , V,R,T=const
RT/V=P/n=const
now to find the amount of mols at the beginning, n=PV/RT=1.3*10-3mol F2

(P/n)i=(P/n)f and i know everything except for n (PF3) which i calculate to come to 1.055*10-3mol

from here i can work out the mass of the PF3

m=n*mw=1.055*10-3mol*(30.97+3*19)g/mol=0.093g

but if i look at the amount of mols that i have here, something doesn't add up since i was meant to have 2/3 the amount of mols of F2 but i have about 0.8 times the amount of mols of F2, meaning that i have more mols than i should according to the equation.

what is wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not all F2 reacted.

Think what unknowns do you have and what equations can you write to describe vessel content after the reaction ended.
 
pv=nrt, i know the pressure, volume, and temp, only n is missing,
n=pv/rt=(0.267*0.061)/(188.15*0.08205)=1.055*10^-3mol

is this right??
 
Yes, but that's sum of two different ns. You have a mixture.
 
i think i see what you are saying
pv=[n(PF3)+n(F2)]rt

[n(PF3)+n(F2)]=1.055*10^-3mol

now i know that n(PF3)=(2/3)*n(initial F2)=(2/3)*1.3*10^-3 =8.667*10^-4

therefore 1.88333*10^-4 didnt react. is this right?
 
Dell said:
n(PF3)=(2/3)*n(initial F2)

That means everything reacted, doesn't it?

Try to write fluorine moles balance.
 
then I am not sure what to do...

as far as i can see they are blanaced, 6F2->4F3

how do i know how much reacted??
 
is this right:

the 1.055*10-3mol is made up of (2/3)*1.055*10-3mol of PF3 and (1/3)*1.055*10-3mol of F2, therefore of the 1.3*10-3mol of F2, 3.5*10-4mol didnt react?
 
No.

You have two substances in the container after ther reaction.

Assume you have nF2 moles of fluorine after the reaction, and nPF3 moles of phosphorus trifluoride.

Obviously

nF2 + nPF3 = 1.055x10-3

How many moles of fluorine is in the mixture of nF2 and nPF3? Write equation that will take into account fact that 1 mole of nPF3 contains 1.5 mole of F2.

You know number of moles of fluorine that was present in the container before the reaction. Has it changed?

This will give you two equations in two unknowns.
 
  • #10
i see what you are saying, but i seem to get stuck with it every time,
can i not say

X=number of moles of F2 that reacted, therefore


(4/6)X+[(1.3*10^-3)-x]=1.055*10^-3

[moles of PF3] + [moles of P2 remaining] = 1.055*10^-3

then i get X=moles F2 that reacted=7.35*10^-4moles
 
  • #11
Dell said:
X=number of moles of F2 that reacted, therefore

(4/6)X+[(1.3*10^-3)-x]=1.055*10^-3

That's equivalent. I was aiming at:

nF2+nPF3=1.055*10-3
nF2+1.5nPF3=1.3*10-3

Note, that [(1.3*10^-3)-x] from your equation is just amount of fluorine left as calculated from the second equation.

7.35*10^-4moles

That's correct :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
12K