Solving Physics Problem with Angles and Trigonometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving forces, angles, and trigonometry. The initial approach involves analyzing forces exerted by two friends, establishing that the total force in the x-direction is zero and deriving height (H) in relation to the forces and time. Concerns are raised about the assumption of free fall, as the scenario does not involve downward movement unless the rope breaks. Participants encourage the self-learner to continue practicing and emphasize the importance of understanding the components of forces at different angles. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying trigonometry in physics problems and the value of persistence in learning.
Angetaire
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A man has fallen into a ditch of width d and two of his friends are slowly pulling him out using a light rope and two fixed pulleys. Show that the force (assumed equal for both the friends) exerted by each friend on the rope increases as the man moves up. Find the force when the man is at a depth h.
Relevant Equations
None
1642473983628.png

The correct solution uses angles and trigonometry. My solution is as following:

- Suppose the forces exerted by friends 1 and 2 are F1 and F2 respectively.
- There are no net force in the x-direction, so F(total x) = 0.
- F(total y) = F1 + F2 - mg = 0 (initially). Rearranging gives g = [F1+F2]/m
- Initial velocity = 0, I've chosen the origin of my co-ordinate system to be at the initial y-position of the person being pulled up so initial position is (0,0). So H = 1/2gt2
- Insert g gives H = [F1+F2]t2]/2m
- From this equation I gathered that H is proportional to F1 and F2. So as the height increases, F1 and F2 should increase as well (since they're equal). I made an assumption here that the rescue must happen within a limited time frame so greater height must be achieved with greater forces.

- Since the taut ropes make a right-angled triangle with the lip of the ditch, I take the base of the triangle on one side to be d/2, the height h, and the hypothenuse F1. F1= sqrt(h2+(d/2)2).
- So the F(total y) at height h = 2sqrt(h2+(d/2)2)-mg

Is this a valid alternative solution to this problem?

PS: Sorry I'm self-learning with no tutor to help me find out. I'm learning through "Concepts of Physics" Vol 1 by H.C Verma because of it's conciseness (English second language), but there are a lot of non-worked out solutions with a single line of answer. I find myself making a lot of mistakes like this, doing something different from the correct solutions and often not knowing where to start with the more abstractly worded ones (though it's getting better as I do more problems). I attribute it to lack of grasp on material and general inexperience with solving physics problems that don't involve number-chugging. If anyone has tips on how to be a better problem-solver please share.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Angetaire ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​
Angetaire said:
F(total y) = F1 + F2 - mg = 0
In the line just above, you have written that ##F_1 + F_2 = 0 ## (equal and opposite) !
 
Anyway: make a sketch for the case the ropes are at 45 degrees -- you see that F1 and F2 each have a y-component that is not equal to the magnitude ...

##\ ##
 
Angetaire said:
H = 1/2gt2
There is no free fall in this exercise ! Neither downward (unless one of the 'friends' let's go :smile: or the rope breaks), not upwards !

##\ ##
 
Angetaire said:
Sorry I'm self-learning with no tutor
No need to apologise ! On the contrary: kudos! PF is a good place to solicit comments, so keep
Angetaire said:
do more problems

:smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top