Solving Physics Problem with Angles and Trigonometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving forces, angles, and trigonometry. The initial approach involves analyzing forces exerted by two friends, establishing that the total force in the x-direction is zero and deriving height (H) in relation to the forces and time. Concerns are raised about the assumption of free fall, as the scenario does not involve downward movement unless the rope breaks. Participants encourage the self-learner to continue practicing and emphasize the importance of understanding the components of forces at different angles. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying trigonometry in physics problems and the value of persistence in learning.
Angetaire
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A man has fallen into a ditch of width d and two of his friends are slowly pulling him out using a light rope and two fixed pulleys. Show that the force (assumed equal for both the friends) exerted by each friend on the rope increases as the man moves up. Find the force when the man is at a depth h.
Relevant Equations
None
1642473983628.png

The correct solution uses angles and trigonometry. My solution is as following:

- Suppose the forces exerted by friends 1 and 2 are F1 and F2 respectively.
- There are no net force in the x-direction, so F(total x) = 0.
- F(total y) = F1 + F2 - mg = 0 (initially). Rearranging gives g = [F1+F2]/m
- Initial velocity = 0, I've chosen the origin of my co-ordinate system to be at the initial y-position of the person being pulled up so initial position is (0,0). So H = 1/2gt2
- Insert g gives H = [F1+F2]t2]/2m
- From this equation I gathered that H is proportional to F1 and F2. So as the height increases, F1 and F2 should increase as well (since they're equal). I made an assumption here that the rescue must happen within a limited time frame so greater height must be achieved with greater forces.

- Since the taut ropes make a right-angled triangle with the lip of the ditch, I take the base of the triangle on one side to be d/2, the height h, and the hypothenuse F1. F1= sqrt(h2+(d/2)2).
- So the F(total y) at height h = 2sqrt(h2+(d/2)2)-mg

Is this a valid alternative solution to this problem?

PS: Sorry I'm self-learning with no tutor to help me find out. I'm learning through "Concepts of Physics" Vol 1 by H.C Verma because of it's conciseness (English second language), but there are a lot of non-worked out solutions with a single line of answer. I find myself making a lot of mistakes like this, doing something different from the correct solutions and often not knowing where to start with the more abstractly worded ones (though it's getting better as I do more problems). I attribute it to lack of grasp on material and general inexperience with solving physics problems that don't involve number-chugging. If anyone has tips on how to be a better problem-solver please share.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Angetaire ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​
Angetaire said:
F(total y) = F1 + F2 - mg = 0
In the line just above, you have written that ##F_1 + F_2 = 0 ## (equal and opposite) !
 
Anyway: make a sketch for the case the ropes are at 45 degrees -- you see that F1 and F2 each have a y-component that is not equal to the magnitude ...

##\ ##
 
Angetaire said:
H = 1/2gt2
There is no free fall in this exercise ! Neither downward (unless one of the 'friends' let's go :smile: or the rope breaks), not upwards !

##\ ##
 
Angetaire said:
Sorry I'm self-learning with no tutor
No need to apologise ! On the contrary: kudos! PF is a good place to solicit comments, so keep
Angetaire said:
do more problems

:smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...

Similar threads

Back
Top