Solving position vectors using given speed.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle P that starts at a specific position vector and moves with a constant velocity. The task is to determine the time taken for the particle to reach a new position vector, given its speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between position vectors and velocity, with attempts to set up equations based on the particle's movement. There are questions about the validity of the vectors used and the application of vector magnitude in the context of speed.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to set up the equations correctly and clarify the relationships between the vectors and speed. There is ongoing exploration of the mathematical principles involved, particularly regarding vector magnitudes and their implications for the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the initial vectors and the application of formulas, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. Participants express uncertainty about the mathematical operations involved in relating speed and vector magnitudes.

riddle
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle P starts at the point with position vector 4i + j. P moves with constant velocity vm/s. After t seconds, P is at the point with position vector 12i - 11j. Find t if the speed of P is 4m/s.

Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


6i - 3j = -2i + 3j + vt
=> 8i - 6j = vt
=> 8i - 6j = *bleh. and now I'm stuck.*
 
Physics news on Phys.org
riddle said:

Homework Statement


A particle P starts at the point with position vector 4i + j. P moves with constant velocity vm/s. After t seconds, P is at the point with position vector 12i - 11j. Find t if the speed of P is 4m/s.

Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


6i - 3j = -2i + 3j + vt
=> 8i - 6j = vt
=> 8i - 6j = *bleh. and now I'm stuck.*
Use the formula in the attachment in your other problem, r = r0 + vt.

In your attempt, where did 6i - 3j and -2i + 3j come from? They don't have anything to do with this problem.

At 0 seconds, the particle is at r0 = 4i + j. After t seconds, r = 12i - 11j.

So 12i - 11j = 4i + j + v t.

Start with this equation, simplify it a bit, and use the idea that if two vectors are equal, their magnitudes are also equal.
 
HAHAHAHA. This is the second time I've done this. *facepalm* I copied the wrong vectors.
r0 = -2i + 3j, and r = 6i - 3j.

So, 8i - 6j = tv

And I really have no idea what to do to proceed.

EDIT: Ok. So,
8i - 6j = vt
Both sides are equivalent.
Speed = |v|
So,
| 8i - 6j | = |vt|
=> 10 = 4t
=> t= 2.5
So t=2.5 seconds?
But can you just multiply like that?
What I mean to say is that is |vt| = |v| * t ?
 
Last edited:
riddle said:
HAHAHAHA. This is the second time I've done this. *facepalm* I copied the wrong vectors.
r0 = -2i + 3j, and r = 6i - 3j.

So, 8i - 6j = tv

And I really have no idea what to do to proceed.

EDIT: Ok. So,
8i - 6j = vt
Both sides are equivalent.
Both sides are equal. There is a difference. Statements can be equivalent (same truth values); expressions can be equal (or less than, greater than, etc.).
riddle said:
Speed = |v|
So,
| 8i - 6j | = |vt|
=> 10 = 4t
=> t= 2.5
So t=2.5 seconds?
But can you just multiply like that?
What I mean to say is that is |vt| = |v| * t ?

Yes, the magnitude of a scalar times a vector is the scalar times the magnitude of the vector.

More precisely, |kv| = |k||v|. This takes into account the possibility that k is a negative number.
 
Mark44 said:
More precisely, |kv| = |k||v|. This takes into account the possibility that k is a negative number.
Wait, don't you mean |kv| = k * |v|
Or are you just implying that the magnitude of a scalar is the sacalr itself, i.e, |k| = k

*sigh* I need some sleep.
 
|k| means the absolute value of the scalar k, which is always positive, like the magnitude (length) of a vector. So if k = -5, then |k| = 5. If k = 5, |k| = 5. It just means, throw away the minus sign if there is one.
 
No, I mean exactly what I wrote, namely that |kv| = |k||v|. The magnitude of a scalar is its distance from 0.

For example, let v = 3i + 4j, so |v| = 5.
|-2v| = |-2(3i + 4j)| = |-6i - 8j)| = [itex]\sqrt[/itex]((-6)2 + (-8)2) = [itex]\sqrt[/itex](36 + 64) = [itex]\sqrt[/itex](100) = 10 = 2|v|
 
Oh.
I can't wait till I'm as smart as you guys. *anticipation emoticon*
EDIT: And thanks for all your help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
39K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K