Vectors - show that the lines intersect

  • Thread starter Thread starter smn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Vectors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 39K views
smn
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm currently revising for a maths exam and I'm stuck on the following question:

Show that the lines:

r = (i+j+k) + s(i+2j+3k)

r = (4i+6j+5k) + t(2i+3j+k)

Intersect.

My work so far:

Let (i+j+k) + s(i+2j+3k) = (4i+6j+5k) + t(2i+3j+k)

So (i) 1+s = 4+2t

(j) 1+2s = 6+3t

(k) 1+3s = 5+t

I'm unsure where to go from here, any help would be appreciated.

Regards

smn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, you have three equations that must be satisfied for an intersection.
Is there a pair of values (s,t) that satisfies all three equations simultaneously?

[Try using, say, equation (i) with equation (j), then the result with (k) etc...] Once you determine a pair (s,t), check that it satisfies each equation.
 
Well, if they intersect, then they must by necessity have a point in common. You started on that above. If they have a point in common, what can you say about possible solutions to the system of equations you found?
 
Thanks for the prompt replys.

I realize that you have to solve for s and t and these values should equal if the lines intersect.

I was unsure what to do next with the 3 equations in order to solve for s and t.
I'm now going to try using simultaneous equations, as mentioned, to try and solve for s and t.

Regards

smn
 
Yes, i worked out that s=1 and t= -1. I then sub'd these values into the 3rd equation and it satisfied this also ( 4=4).

Thanks for all your help

Regards

Sam
 
Using pre-calculus methods? Only way I can think of is to show they are coplanar and not parallel.
 
daveb said:
Using pre-calculus methods? Only way I can think of is to show they are coplanar and not parallel.

Are use of the dot- and cross-product operations considered pre-calculus?
Note that the OP has already written lines in parametric vector form:
[tex]\vec A=\vec A_0 + s\vec U[/tex]
[tex]\vec B=\vec B_0 + t\vec V[/tex]
which is already somewhat advanced by introductory standards.
 
It wan't when I was in HS, but that was back in the late 70s.