Solving Reciprocal Trigonometric Equation cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a reciprocal trigonometric equation involving cotangent and cosecant functions, specifically the equation cot²θ + 5cosecθ = 4. Participants explore the implications of the equation and the nature of its solutions within a specified range.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of the original equation into a quadratic form and the subsequent application of the quadratic formula. There is a focus on the implications of the solutions for cosecθ and the validity of the resulting sine values. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the results and the conversion between radians and degrees.

Discussion Status

Several participants confirm agreement on the calculated solutions within the specified range. There is ongoing exploration of the terminology used, particularly regarding the concept of "reciprocal" in the context of trigonometric functions. Some participants express confusion about certain terms and seek clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the requirement for solutions to fall within the range of 0° to 360°. There is also mention of potential misunderstandings related to the terminology of reciprocal functions and their inverses.

AN630078
Messages
242
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
Hello, I have been practising reciprocal trigonometric equations and have found a question to solve;

cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4 giving all answers in the range 0 °<θ<360 °

I am not actually struggling to solve the equation, but rather how to find the solutions in the given range.
Relevant Equations
cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4
cot^2θ+5cosecθ=4
cot^2θ+5cosecθ-4=0
cosec^2θ+5cosec-4-1=0
cosec^2θ+5cosec-5=0
Let u=cosecθ
u^2+5u-5=0
Solve using the quadratic formula;
u=(-5± 3√5)/2
u=(-5+ 3√5)/2=0.8541...
Substitute cosecθ=u
Therefore, cosecθ=0.8541
1/sinθ=0.8541
sinθ=1/0.8541=1.170... which is not true since sin x cannot be greater than 1 for real solutions.

u=(-5-3√5)/2=-5.8541...
cosecθ=-5.8541...
1/sinθ=(-5-3√5)/2
1*2=(-5-3√5)*sinθ
2=(-5-3√5)*sinθ
2/(-5-3√5)=sinθ
Multiply by the conjugate;
2*(-5+3√5)/(-5-3√5)(-5+3√5)=2*(-5+3√5)/-20=-(-5+3√5)/10
sinθ=-(-5+3√5)/10
My difficulty is solving this last part, do I then take the arcsin of -(-5+3√5)/10?
θ=arcsin(-(-5+3√5)/10)
θ=-0.17166 + 2πn, θ=π+0.17166+2πn
Since the solutions should be in the range 0 °<θ<360 ° should I convert this from radians to degrees?
θ=-0.17166=-9.8353935.. °~-9.84 °which falls outside the specified range, but -9.84 °+360 °=350.16° (which is within the range)
and θ=π+0.17166=3.31325 rad=189.835... ° ~ 189.8 ° to 1.d.p
Other solutions 189.8 °+360 °=549.8° (which lies outside the given range)

So would the solutions in the range 0 °<θ<360 ° be θ=189.8 °and θ=350.16°?
I would be very grateful of any advice 👍
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got the same result.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078
fresh_42 said:
I got the same result.
Thank you for your reply, so the solutions in the range 0 °<θ<360 ° would be θ=189.8 °and θ=350.16°?
 
Yes. I haven't checked the digits behind the point though, but it was 9.8°sth. I checked whether it is a better number in radians, but that didn't look any better. I first thought your polynomial was wrong, until I realized that I calculated in sine instead of your cosecans.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078
What is 'reciprocal' about it?
 
epenguin said:
What is 'reciprocal' about it?
Maybe the co's: cosec, cotan; all inverses of the 'normal'.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078
epenguin said:
What is 'reciprocal' about it?
The reciprocal of sinθ is cosecθ.
 
fresh_42 said:
Maybe the co's: cosec, cotan; all inverses of the 'normal'.
Yes, that is what I meant 😁
 
fresh_42 said:
Yes. I haven't checked the digits behind the point though, but it was 9.8°sth. I checked whether it is a better number in radians, but that didn't look any better. I first thought your polynomial was wrong, until I realized that I calculated in sine instead of your cosecans.
Thank you for your reply. Oh splendid, just to ask what do you mean be 9.8°sth?
 
  • #10
Nine point eight degrees something, i.e. ##9.8\ldots °##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
Nine point eight degrees something, i.e. ##9.8\ldots °##
Oh, ok I was confused by the "something". Thank you for explaining 👍
 
  • #12
AN630078 said:
Oh, ok I was confused by the "something". Thank you for explaining 👍
My fault, and worst of all: such an internet speak is against the rules ...:mad:
Not sure whether I can give myself a warning?!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078
  • #13
fresh_42 said:
My fault, and worst of all: such an internet speak is against the rules ...:mad:
Not sure whether I can give myself a warning?!
No do not worry, I am pleased you have used it, now I know its meaning 😁
 
  • #14
fresh_42 said:
Maybe the co's: cosec, cotan; all inverses of the 'normal'.

OK, equations involving the reciprocal trig functions - reciprocal.equations are something else (equations where the reciprocals of roots are also roots).

The co's are not inverses, but the arcsin etc. which you use to get the angles are inverses of the trig functions.

I got the same exact result.
Good insight there that you realized that even if the calculator gives you only one solution, there has to be another.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AN630078

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K