Solving Resonance Problem: Explain Frequency of Tuning Fork

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhackyWookie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
Click For Summary
A tuning fork vibrating above a vertical open tube filled with water resonates at two specific air column lengths: 0.125 m and 0.395 m. The book claims the frequency of the tuning fork is 635 Hz, which contradicts the calculated fundamental frequency of 686 Hz for a 0.125 m closed tube. The discussion highlights confusion over the book's methodology, particularly regarding the assumption of harmonic differences between the two resonant lengths. Participants suggest using the formula for resonance length and the universal wave equation to derive the correct frequency. The consensus indicates that the book's answer is likely incorrect based on fundamental frequency principles.
WhackyWookie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A tuning fork is set into vibration above a vertica oepn tube filled with water. The water level is allowed to drop slowly. As it does, the air in the tube above the water level is heard to resonate with the tuning fork when the distance from the tube opening to the water level is 0.125 m and again at 0.395 m. What is the frequency of the tuning work?

The answer given on the back of the book is 635 hz. Not only do I have no idea how the book got this answer, but this answer is also is less than the fundamental frequency of a 0.125 m closed tube, which is 686 hz.

Could someone provide an explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can use the formula L_n = {(2n-1)/4}*wavelength where L_n is length of the air column and n is the which antinode you are measuring from probably the first and second. (I believe the term is resonance length but I am not sure) You then solve for the wavelength and find the frequence using the universal wave equation V=frequence*wavelength
 
Chen, I went to the link, but their solution makes no sense. They assumed that the 0.125m and 0.395m tubes' resonant frequency differs by 1 harmonics and used nothing to back that up.

Additionally, as I have said before, 635 hz is below the fundamental frequency of a 0.125 m half open tube.

Physics_is_phun, I used ur equation originally and got the answer that is wrong according to the book.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K