Solving Rolling Disk Homework: Find V, ω, KE Rot & Trans

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a solid uniform disk rolling down an incline, with participants attempting to find the linear speed, angular speed, and kinetic energies associated with the disk's motion. The problem involves concepts from dynamics and rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various equations related to rotational motion and energy conservation, questioning the derivation and application of specific formulas. Some express uncertainty about the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to derive the necessary equations. Some participants have provided insights into the relationships between linear and angular quantities, while others are clarifying their understanding of the equations involved. No consensus has been reached, but productive dialogue continues.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain parameters, such as height, which complicates their calculations. There is also discussion around the assumptions made in deriving equations, particularly in relation to the incline's angle.

nopistons93
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid uniform disk of radius 0.250 m and mass 55.0 kg rolls down an incline that makes an angle of 15 degrees with the horizontal. The disk starts from rest from the top of the ramp. Find the speed of the disk's center of mass when it reaches the bottom of the ramp(linear speed), its angular speed omega at that point and its KE rotational and KE translational energies.


Homework Equations


V(linear) = [tex]omega[/tex]*R
[tex]\alpha[/tex]=R*[tex]\omega[/tex]2
v=R*[tex]\omega[/tex]
a=R*[tex]\alpha[/tex]

PE = KErotational + KEtranslational

I = 1/2mr2

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for I and got 1.72 kg * m^2 however without height or length I can't solve for the PE side inorder to get the KE.

I've seen the equation [tex]\alpha[/tex]=2gsin[tex]\Theta[/tex]/3R and that's the only thing I've noticed that would allow me to solve for either V or [tex]\omega[/tex] in this case. Am I missing something here, some equation which relates another way to this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ok so deriving the formula a = g*sin(theta)/1.5 , I found out that a = 1.69 m/s^2

since alpha = a/r , I found alpha to be 6.76 m/s^2.

since alpha=r*omega^s , i found omega to be 5.20 m/s again.

Solving for v from (v=r*omega), I found v equal to 1.30 m/s

i then plugged these numbers into the KE formulas to solve for them. Does that sound right?
 


nopistons93 said:
I've seen the equation [tex]\alpha[/tex]=2gsin[tex]\Theta[/tex]/3R and that's the only thing I've noticed that would allow me to solve for either V or [tex]\omega[/tex] in this case. Am I missing something here, some equation which relates another way to this problem?

This equations is actually easily derived. Just start working out the problem assuming you do have h (height), use PE = KE. You will end up with [tex]Vcm^2 = \frac{4gh}{3}[/tex]. You then need to remember the equation [tex]V^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad[/tex]. Since Vi = 0, you will be able to plug in that equation for V^2 and get the equation you mentioned (noticed that h (height) cancels out, so it is not needed)
 


im not understanding whre the Vcm^2 = 4gh/3 is coming from though..
 


all right well you start out with mgh = 1/2 I(omega)^2 + 1/2 1/2 mv^2. I = 1/2mr^2 as you said. omega = v/r. After a little algebra you should arrive at Vcm^2 = 4gh/3
 


ok exactly what I was looking for there man. thank you very much\
 


hey crypto,

im at the point..

2*a*d*sin(theta)=4gh/3

that reduces to a = 2g/3sin(theta) for some reason..
 


that's right, it's pretty much the same equation as you wrote, divide both sides by r (radius), and you will get [tex]\alpha = \frac{2gsin(\theta)}{3R}[/tex]
 


well my equation yields 25.42 while the correct one yields 1.69
 
  • #10


you mean for a (acceleration)? didn't you get 1.69 a couple posts back?
 
  • #11


Yes, just putting radius in the formula gives you alpha. I do understand I think I'm just writing down my algebra wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
3K