Solving Second Moment of Area for Beam w/ Missing Circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ganondorf29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Moment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the second moment of area (I) for a beam with a missing circular section. The correct approach involves first calculating the moment of inertia for the square section without the hole and then subtracting the moment of inertia for the circular section. It is crucial to apply the parallel axis theorem to adjust for the centroid of the beam when combining the moments of inertia of the square and rectangular sections. The formula for the second moment of area, Ixx = bh^12/12, was incorrectly stated initially, highlighting the need for careful attention to detail in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second moment of area (I) calculations
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Knowledge of basic beam mechanics
  • Proficiency in using moment of inertia formulas
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the parallel axis theorem in structural analysis
  • Learn how to calculate the moment of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Explore the implications of centroid location on moment of inertia
  • Review examples of beam analysis with complex shapes in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, civil engineers, and students studying structural analysis who need to understand the calculation of the second moment of area for beams with irregular shapes.

ganondorf29
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having a problem calculating the I value for this beam. I'm not sure on how to account for the missing circle in the front square and how to account for the beam changing from a 1" x 1" square to a 5" x 0.5" beam


Homework Equations



Ixx = bh^12/12

The centroid of the beam is around x = 2.89711 in

The thickness of the beam is the same and so is it's density


The Attempt at a Solution



Here is a picture of the beam


**If there was no missing circle, could I just add I_square + I_rect = I_total? **
 

Attachments

  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
ganondorf29:
The reason why you need to calculate I (2nd moment of area) is not clear. Please include a complete statement of the problem you are trying to solve.
 
ganondorf29 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is a picture of the beam


**If there was no missing circle, could I just add I_square + I_rect = I_total? **


First thing, just get I for the square (with no hole in it) and then subtract the I for a cylinder. That will give you the I for the shape.

Second thing: The I that you get will be about its own centroid, not the centroid of the beam. So you need apply parallel axis theorem for the square (with the hole) and the rectangular section before you add them up.
 
Do you want the I about the x-axis, or the y-axis? If about the x-axis, the parallel axis theorem as suggested by rockfreak does not apply. You made a mistake in your formula for Ixx in post #1. Can you see what the error is?
 
rock.freak667 said:
First thing, just get I for the square (with no hole in it) and then subtract the I for a cylinder. That will give you the I for the shape.

Second thing: The I that you get will be about its own centroid, not the centroid of the beam. So you need apply parallel axis theorem for the square (with the hole) and the rectangular section before you add them up.


EDIT: Pongo is right, forget my parallel axis thing, I keep substituting I with J.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K