Second Moment of Area Problem for Floor Plate with Cross Beams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the deflection of a solid metal plate used as a manhole cover, specifically a 900mm square plate that is 5mm thick and supported by 20 cross beams. The load is applied at the center of a 25mm square area. The key challenge is determining whether to include all beams in the second moment of inertia calculations or only those directly under the load. The user has modeled the scenario in ANSYS but seeks a more straightforward spreadsheet approach to estimate deflection and ensure the design can withstand standard loads without excessive displacement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second moment of area calculations
  • Familiarity with beam deflection theory
  • Knowledge of load distribution methods
  • Experience with ANSYS for structural modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of second moment of inertia for composite sections
  • Learn about trapezoidal load distribution in beam theory
  • Study flexural stiffness calculations in structural engineering
  • Explore spreadsheet modeling techniques for structural analysis
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students involved in beam deflection analysis and load-bearing design of metal plates.

Freezer12
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I need to know how to attack a problem for a solid metal plate.

The plate is used as a manhole cover, so it needs to withstand a certain load. The load is calculated by placing a large weight at the centre of area 25x25. I can't for the life of me figure out how to do a simple supported beam calculation on the plate so that I can calculate the amount the plate will bend under the load, and whether this is acceptable.

Basically the problem is a simple beam supported at either end with a weight in the middle.. I think. I have attached a picture of the plate.

Plate is 5mm thick, 900mm square - supported by cross beams - 20 beams 25mm high, 5mm thick, with a load in the centre of the plate 25mm square.

The load is acting down on the plate, the cross beams are supported at both ends, and the plate itself is supported on all four sides.

The second moment of inertia equations are what I'm using for this, however I'm not sure if I should be including all 20 beams in the equation, or whether I should only be using the ones under the weight itself. This is because the beams under the weight will be the ones supporting the load, whereas the other beams will not be supporting it so much. I am combining this with the second moment of the area of the plate as well.

Does anyone have any insight as to how to tackle this problem? The purpose of this is to give a very vague idea of whether the beam and plate variables I use will be able to withstand a standard load in the middle without displacing too much. I plugged the exact dimensions into ANSYS to model, however it came out as being able to withstand massive amounts of force, so I'm resorting to plugging the dimensions into a spreadsheet.
 

Attachments

  • plate.png
    plate.png
    19.8 KB · Views: 586
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no single 'right' answer to this. It does depend on the assumptions you make. Clearly, just taking the ribs under the point load is safe, but there can be no doubt that adjacent ribs participate to some extent. A simple model would be trapezoidal load distribution tapering from zero at edges tapering to a max at the centre. Another approach could be to calculate the flexural stiffnesses in the x and y directions. Consider a beam strip in each direction at the centre and equate the formulas for deflection in each direction. you have to partition the load qx in x direction and qy in y direction. Equating the deflection gives ratio qx/qy and combining this with q=qx + qy solves the problem of moment partition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
24K