Solving Second Order Nonhomogeneous DEs with Initial Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Plaetean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a second order nonhomogeneous differential equation (DE) with initial conditions. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the interpretation of a particular solution and its relation to the overall solution of the DE.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the distinction between particular and complementary solutions, with some questioning the initial conditions and how to apply them. There are discussions about using Euler's formula and the implications of complex numbers in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding Euler's formula and the structure of the solution. The original poster has made progress in formulating the general solution but remains uncertain about applying the initial conditions correctly. There is an ongoing exploration of how to handle the complex components of the solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion about whether the initial conditions should be interpreted as applying to real or complex parts of the solution. The problem's setup appears to lead to multiple interpretations regarding the application of initial values.

Plaetean
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ya5ywMw.png



Homework Equations



y=yPI+yCF

The Attempt at a Solution


First issue is I was under the impression that a particular solution is the final solution to a DE; a solved DE with initial conditions applied, but it would be weird for that to be the first part of the question so I'm interpreting a) as asking for the particular integral (maybe they're the same thing :S). Anyway for the first part of the question I've done:

yPI=Ceit

so dyPI/dt = iCeit and d2yPI/dt2= -Ceit

-C+4C=1

which gives: C=1/3

so yPI=(1/3)eit

Using a trial solution for the complementary function gives yCF=Ae2it+Be-2it

and a general solution of:

y=Ae2it+Be-2it+(1/3)eit

At this point I have no idea how to start applying initial conditions as I have an expression that's full of 'i's, so maybe I don't understand the first part of the question and have gone about the whole thing the wrong way. Some help would be really appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
here is a hint that may help.
Euler's formula

e^(it)=cos(t)+i*sin(t)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Sorry. You need to brush up on your ODEs.

The 'final solution' to a linear ODE, to use that unfortunate term, is composed of the solution to the homogeneous ODE plus the solution to the particular ODE. Because there are various constants associated with these solutions, application of the initial values is required to determine the exact solution to the specified ODE and initial conditions.

This problem is a little inverted, in that it asks you to find a particular solution first, then find the homogeneous solution.

To apply your two initial conditions, take your general solution y(t) = MESS and set t = 0, since y(0) = 0.
Then, for y'(0) = 0, calculate the derivative y'(t) and set t = 0 there. You'll wind up with two equations for the two unknown constants A and B. Solve for same.
 
donpacino said:
here is a hint that may help.
Euler's formula

e^(it)=cos(t)+i*sin(t)

I tried using this, but when they say y(0)=0, shouldn't they give the value as a complex number? Is it just the real part that =0, or is the complex part 0 as well?
 
##0 + 0i = 0##
if: ##y(t) = e^{it} + C##,
then ##y(0) = e^{0i} + C = 1+C##
or: ##y(t) = e^{it} + C = \text{cos}(t) + i \text{sin}(t) + C##,
and ##y(0) = \text{cos}(0) + i \text{sin}(0) + C = 1 + 0i + C##
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
##0 + 0i = 0##
if: ##y(t) = e^{it} + C##,
then ##y(0) = e^{0i} + C = 1+C##
or: ##y(t) = e^{it} + C = \text{cos}(t) + i \text{sin}(t) + C##,
and ##y(0) = \text{cos}(0) + i \text{sin}(0) + C = 1 + 0i + C##

In this problem its not y(t)=eit+c but ceit. I'm stuck because I can get an expression for the coefficients with y(0)=0 as below:

y(0)=1/3+A+B

But if I use Euler's method and differentiate the expression, all the real terms become sine terms, so saying that dy/dt(0)=0 doesn't help.
 
but you have no dy/dt expression in your diff eq?
 
oh I didn't see that in your initial conditions
 
Plaetean said:
In this problem its not y(t)=eit+c but ceit. I'm stuck because I can get an expression for the coefficients with y(0)=0 as below:

y(0)=1/3+A+B

But if I use Euler's method and differentiate the expression, all the real terms become sine terms, so saying that dy/dt(0)=0 doesn't help.

That's where you mistake is! Don't use Euler method Find the complete complex form for dy/dt and set it to zero at t=0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Ah I got it, didn't need to use Euler's at all, had a massive brain fart and forgot that I could just equate real and complex terms anyway to solve for constants.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K