Solving Simple Inequality: \frac {2}{x} < 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter razored
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality \(\frac{2}{x} < 3\) leads to two distinct solution sets: \(x > \frac{2}{3}\) and \(x < 0\). The solution \(x < 0\) arises from the necessity to reverse the inequality when multiplying by a negative \(x\). The discussion emphasizes that \(x\) cannot equal zero, as \(\frac{2}{0}\) is undefined. Therefore, valid solutions are strictly \(x > \frac{2}{3}\) or \(x < 0\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of undefined expressions in mathematics
  • Ability to analyze solution sets for inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rational inequalities
  • Learn about the implications of multiplying both sides of an inequality by a variable
  • Explore the concept of undefined expressions in algebra
  • Practice solving various types of inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Students learning algebra, educators teaching inequality concepts, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in mathematics.

razored
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve : \frac {2}{x} &lt; 3

The answers are \frac {2}{3} &lt; x and x&lt;0

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac {2}{x} = 3
Multiplying by x and dividing by 3, I obtain \frac {2}{3} &lt; x

Where did they obtain x&lt;0 as an answer? Also, accounting that x can be a negative, \frac {2}{3} &gt; x also seems like a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it. If x>0, then you get, as you say, x>2/3 AND x>0. Here the x>0 is superfluous since if x>2/3 it's automatically bigger than 0. If x<0 then you reverse the inequality when you multiply by x, so 2>3x. Or 2/3>x AND x<0. Here the 2/3>x is superfluous, since if x<0 it's automatically less than 2/3. Try some numbers if you don't believe me.
 
It just means x either has to be bigger than 2/3 or smaller than 0. Makes sense, for example 1/2 is smaller than 2/3, plug it in and u get 4, which is not smaller than 3. Now try 2 which is bigger than 2/3, u get 1 which is smaller than three. This is why 2/3 > x doesn't make sense.

Now obviously, if the number on the left was negative it would be smaller than 3 however infinitely small (-1000000) or -0.0001 it is. So anything smaller than 0 would make solve the inequality.
 
Dick, you want also to emphasise that x must not be 0; 0 can not be solution in the example.
 
symbolipoint said:
Dick, you want also to emphasise that x must not be 0; 0 can not be solution in the example.

I hereby emphasize I do not endorse x=0 as a solution. In fact, I denounce anyone who supports me who would say x=0. Because they would be a terrorist, since 2/0 is not defined. How's that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K