Solving Simple Inequality: \frac {2}{x} < 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter razored
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the inequality \(\frac{2}{x} < 3\). Participants explore the implications of the inequality and the conditions under which it holds true, particularly focusing on the behavior of \(x\) in relation to positive and negative values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the solutions \(\frac{2}{3} < x\) and \(x < 0\), questioning how both conditions arise. There is exploration of the implications of \(x\) being positive or negative and the effects on the inequality when multiplied by \(x\).

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the reasoning behind the solutions. Some emphasize the necessity of excluding \(x = 0\) from the solution set, while others reinforce the conditions under which the inequality holds. Multiple interpretations of the inequality are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the behavior of the inequality under different conditions for \(x\), particularly regarding its sign. The discussion also highlights the undefined nature of division by zero, which is relevant to the problem context.

razored
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve : \frac {2}{x} &lt; 3

The answers are \frac {2}{3} &lt; x and x&lt;0

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac {2}{x} = 3
Multiplying by x and dividing by 3, I obtain \frac {2}{3} &lt; x

Where did they obtain x&lt;0 as an answer? Also, accounting that x can be a negative, \frac {2}{3} &gt; x also seems like a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it. If x>0, then you get, as you say, x>2/3 AND x>0. Here the x>0 is superfluous since if x>2/3 it's automatically bigger than 0. If x<0 then you reverse the inequality when you multiply by x, so 2>3x. Or 2/3>x AND x<0. Here the 2/3>x is superfluous, since if x<0 it's automatically less than 2/3. Try some numbers if you don't believe me.
 
It just means x either has to be bigger than 2/3 or smaller than 0. Makes sense, for example 1/2 is smaller than 2/3, plug it in and u get 4, which is not smaller than 3. Now try 2 which is bigger than 2/3, u get 1 which is smaller than three. This is why 2/3 > x doesn't make sense.

Now obviously, if the number on the left was negative it would be smaller than 3 however infinitely small (-1000000) or -0.0001 it is. So anything smaller than 0 would make solve the inequality.
 
Dick, you want also to emphasise that x must not be 0; 0 can not be solution in the example.
 
symbolipoint said:
Dick, you want also to emphasise that x must not be 0; 0 can not be solution in the example.

I hereby emphasize I do not endorse x=0 as a solution. In fact, I denounce anyone who supports me who would say x=0. Because they would be a terrorist, since 2/0 is not defined. How's that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K