MHB Solving Simultaneous Equations: x⁴-y²-xy=4-√15, x³+y³-3x=5√5

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the system of equations x⁴ - y² - xy = 4 - √15 and x³ + y³ - 3x = 5√5. The original poster attempted a trigonometric approach but found it unproductive, leading to a reformulation of the equations using tangent substitutions. Graphical analysis suggests that the blue graph approximates the line x + y = 0, while the brown graph resembles parabolas y = ±x², indicating limited intersection points. A crossing point in the positive quadrant was identified at x = √3 and y = √5, but the location of the other intersection remains uncertain. Further exploration of the second intersection point is anticipated.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

I hope to gain some insights on how to solve this system of equations because I tried it many times to use trigonometric approach but to no avail...:mad:

Problem:

Solve the system of equations

$x^4-y^2-xy=4-\sqrt{15}$

$x^3+y^3-3x=5\sqrt{5}$

Attempt:

At first glance, $x^3-3x$ suggests the substitution of $x=\tan p$ so that $x^3-3x=\tan^3 p-3\tan p=(3\tan^2 p-1)(\tan 3p)$

and the second given equation can be rewritten as below, if we also let $y=\tan q$,

$x^3-3x=5\sqrt{5}-y^3$

$(3\tan^2 p-1)(\tan 3p)=5\sqrt{5}-\tan^3 q$

$\tan^3 q=5\sqrt{5}-(3\tan^2 p-1)(\tan 3p)$

and the first equation becomes

$x^4-y^2-xy=4-\sqrt{15}$

$\tan^4 p-\tan^2 q-\tan p \tan q=4-\sqrt{15}$

$\tan^2 q+\tan p \tan q+4-\sqrt{15}-\tan^4 p=0$

Even if I solve the equation above for $\tan q$ by the quadratic formula, I can see that this is of a futile attempt...

Could someone please help me to solve this very hard problem for me? Thanks in advance.:o
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[graph]pqglddsffo[/graph] (Click on the diagram for an enlargement.)

The brown graph shows the first equation and the blue graph shows the second one. As they go off to infinity, the blue graph approximates the line $x+y=0$ and the brown graph approximates the parabolas $y = \pm x^2$. So I doubt whether there can be any solutions apart from the two crossing points in the diagram. The crossing point in the positive quadrant occurs when $x=\sqrt3,\ y=\sqrt5$ (obtained by guesswork!). I do not see how to locate the other crossing point.
 
Opalg said:
[graph]pqglddsffo[/graph] (Click on the diagram for an enlargement.)

The brown graph shows the first equation and the blue graph shows the second one. As they go off to infinity, the blue graph approximates the line $x+y=0$ and the brown graph approximates the parabolas $y = \pm x^2$. So I doubt whether there can be any solutions apart from the two crossing points in the diagram. The crossing point in the positive quadrant occurs when $x=\sqrt3,\ y=\sqrt5$ (obtained by guesswork!). I do not see how to locate the other crossing point.

Thank you for this wonderful insight, Opalg! I will try to find the other intersection point and of course will add to this thread if I have found it.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top