Solving Star Resistor Configuration Problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hi I am little confused by star resistors configuration. The problem is asking for equivalent resistor for the circuit. I have attached the image below (Image is little sloppy because I can't draw with a mouse :D).

My logic is as follows:

First I calculated R1 and R2 as parallel resistors.

Req1 = (1/R2 + 1/R1)^-1
Req1 = 11.25;

Then I calculated that value in series with 4.5 resistor.

Req2 = 11.25 + 4.5 = 15.75;

Since, Req2 is parrallel with R4 then they should also add reciprocally.

Rt = (1/R4 + 1/Req2)^-1 = 6.81;

This value is wrong though I don't know what I did wrong.

Thanks for help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.JPG
    Circuit.JPG
    10.5 KB · Views: 442
on Phys.org
Sorry for the confusion I accidently uploaded the image that doesn't contains the name of the each resistor.

Anyway they are as follows:

R1 = 18 OHM
R2 = 30 OHM
R3 = 4.5 OHM
R4 = 12 OHMThanks.
 
I see but how can I know if they are parallel or not ? If they this star shape ? The way I analyzed this shape is first taking following charge from Positive terminal then when it goes to junction that has R2 and R1 I thought then one charge would go one way while other goes the other way.

Thanks.
 
I believe the equivalent circuit where the way resistors are connected is clearly seen is this one:

http://s14.postimage.org/kr0641tip/equivalent.png
 
I see that makes sense thanks :).
 
Don't let slanted components and wires fool you :smile: If there's an unbroken wired connection between points they all comprise the same node. Feel free to rearrange the drawing so long as the same connections are maintained:

attachment.php?attachmentid=46110&stc=1&d=1334149935.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4.4 KB · Views: 544
I see thanks a lot gneil its easier to draw it in this configuration better than delta configuration. That statement about continuous made me understand the logic a lot because when my book solves questions like this it assumes u already know how to change from configuration to configuration without understanding the process.
 
I think it also helps to imagine a real battery connected to it with a real wires and see the situation that comes from these connections. Helped me to think about that way.