Solving the Conditional Convergence of \((-1)^n/ln(n)\) Series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence properties of the series \((-1)^n/\ln(n)\) from \(n = 2\) to infinity, specifically focusing on whether it converges absolutely, conditionally, or diverges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of the alternating series test and question the results of the limit test regarding absolute convergence. There is discussion about the behavior of \(\ln(n)\) compared to other known series, particularly in relation to divergence.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining different aspects of convergence and divergence. Some suggest that the series cannot be absolutely convergent due to the behavior of \(\ln(n)\), while others are attempting to clarify the implications of known divergent series.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the expected outcome being conditional convergence, which contrasts with the results from the limit test. Participants are also considering the implications of comparing the series to \(1/n\) and the definitions of convergence and divergence.

frasifrasi
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
I am trying to practice for an exam but can't do this question:

does the series \((-1)^n/ln(n) from n = 2 to infinity converge abs/conditionally/diverge?

I know if a do an alternating series test, the integral will converge because lim goes to 0 and a(n+1)<an.

But how can I prove that it's conditionally convergent? I did the limit test but it says that it is absolutely convergent, which is not the answer(it is supposed to be conditionally).

Thank you...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it can't be absolutely, because 1/( ln n ) goes to 0 much slower than another well known series that diverges doesn't it?
 
Last edited:
ok, 1/n diverges as is a bigger series, so 1/ln(n) must also converge, right?
 
write it with inequalities and using the definition of "diverge" show that 1/n FORCES 1/lnn to blow up.
 
Sorry I meant, since thesmaller series diverges, 1/ln(n) will also diverge.
 
And since 1/ln n is a decreasing sequence, the "conditional convergence" part is easy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K