Solving the Differential Eqn. for Field Lines of Vector Fn.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the field lines of a vector function are solutions to a specific differential equation. The subject area includes vector calculus and differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks guidance on how to start proving the relationship between field lines and the differential equation. Some participants suggest using properties of vector functions and their geometric interpretations, while others clarify the conditions under which these properties hold.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the geometric meaning of the problem and discussing the relationship between the derivatives of the field lines and the vector field components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the equation, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method to approach the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the geometric implications of the problem, and participants are questioning the assumptions related to the parametrization of the field lines.

interested_learner
Messages
210
Reaction score
1
I'm not sure under what heading this belongs but I'm going to ask here:

Show that the field lines y = y(x) of a vector function

[tex]\mathbf F(x,y) = \mathbf i F_x(x,y)+\mathbf j F_y(x,y)[/tex]

are solutions of the differential equation

[tex]\frac {dy} {dx} = \frac {F_y(x,y)} {F_x(x,y)}[/tex]

Could someone suggest a way to get started on this one?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Use the fact that for a field line [itex]\vec{r}(t)[/itex], we have the property that [itex]\vec{r}(t)\times \vec{F}(\vec{r}(t))=0[/itex]. What do you get out of this property when the variable of parametrization t is simply the coordinate x?
 
Oops! My eyes just wandered on the sheet of paper on which I had sketched the solution to your problem and sudenly I realized "Hey, I this is not what I wrote in my post!"

The correct condition is that the derivative of r(t) is parallel to the field line:

[tex]\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}(t)\times \vec{F}(\vec{r}(t))=0[/tex]
 
Let me stress the geometric meaning of our problem.
For a function y=y(x) the inclination of the tangent [tex]\alpha_y[/tex]
to the line representing the function in any point x is its derivative in that point:

[tex]\alpha_y = \frac {dy} {dx}[/tex]

For a vector field F(x,y) the inclination of the vector [tex]\alpha_F[/tex] in any point (x,y) is the ratio of its y and x components:

[tex]\alpha_F = \frac {F_y(x,y)} {F_x(x,y)}[/tex]

Hence, your equation

[tex]\frac {dy} {dx} = \frac {F_y(x,y)} {F_x(x,y)}[/tex]

can be seen as equating the two tangents:

[tex]\alpha_y = \alpha_F[/tex].

In other words, that equation states that the inclination of the line y(x) and the vector F(x,y) in the same point are equal. That's the definition of a field line.
 
Thanks. Quasar you had me scratching my head there for a while, but it makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K