Solving the Geodesic equations for a space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lyalpha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the geodesic equations in a 2D polar coordinate system, specifically the equations \(\ddot{r} - r\ddot{\theta} = 0\) and \(\ddot{\theta} + \frac{1}{r}\dot{r}\dot{\theta} = 0\). A correction is noted regarding the second equation, which should include a factor of 2, leading to the conservation of angular momentum expressed as \(\frac{d}{dt} \left( r^2 \, \dot{\theta} \right) = 0\). This allows for the separation of variables and facilitates solving the equations by expressing \(\dot{\theta}\) as a function of \(r\) and the conserved angular momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with polar coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of geodesic equations
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of geodesic equations in polar coordinates
  • Learn about the conservation of angular momentum in classical mechanics
  • Explore methods for solving differential equations
  • Investigate the application of the chain rule in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students in introductory physics or mathematics courses, particularly those focusing on differential equations and classical mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to geodesics and angular momentum.

Lyalpha
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm in an intro course and my shaky ability to solve differential equations is apparent.

How would you go about solving

[itex]\ddot{r}[/itex]-r[itex]\ddot{\theta}[/itex]=0

[itex]\ddot{\theta}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{1}{r}[/itex][itex]\dot{r}[/itex][itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex]=0

It might be obvious. They're the geodesic equations for a 2d polar coordinate system (if I'm correct).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lyalpha said:
I'm in an intro course and my shaky ability to solve differential equations is apparent.

How would you go about solving

[itex]\ddot{r}[/itex]-r[itex]\ddot{\theta}[/itex]=0

[itex]\ddot{\theta}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{1}{r}[/itex][itex]\dot{r}[/itex][itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex]=0

It might be obvious. They're the geodesic equations for a 2d polar coordinate system (if I'm correct).
The second equation is missing a factor of 2. I'm not sure exactly how you derived the geodesic equations, I'm hoping that if I remark that [tex]\Gamma^{\theta}{}_{{r}{\theta}} = \Gamma^{\theta}{}_{{\theta}{r}} = \frac{1}{r}[/tex] you'll see what you omitted. If not, you'll need to write down your derivation.

After this correction, the second equation is equivalent to saying a geodesic conserves angular momentum, i.e

[tex]\frac{d}{dt} \left( r^2 \, \dot{\theta} \right) = 0[/tex]

If you expand this via the chain rule you'll get

[tex]r^2 \ddot{\theta} + 2\,r\,\dot{r}\,\dot{\theta} = 0[/tex]

which is equivalent to the corrected version of eq 2 (just divide both sides by r^2). This should allow you to separate the variables and solve the equatinos without too much difficulty by solving for [itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex] as a function of r and the conserved, constant angular momentum - which you can also regard as a constant of integration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K