Solving the Paradox of the Frame of Reference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the relativistic paradox involving a car and a barn, illustrating how different frames of reference lead to conflicting observations regarding the length of objects. When the car travels at a significant fraction of the speed of light, observers positioned at different locations perceive the car's length differently due to Lorentz contraction. In the barn's frame, the car fits inside, while in the car's frame, it does not. This paradox highlights the importance of understanding simultaneity and the nature of time in special relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Lorentz contraction
  • Knowledge of frames of reference in physics
  • Basic grasp of simultaneity in relativistic contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz contraction in various scenarios
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in different inertial frames
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of special relativity
  • Review practical examples of relativistic effects in high-speed scenarios
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the complexities of special relativity and the implications of different frames of reference in understanding physical phenomena.

shaner-baner
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Here is a question one of my physics teachers mentiones a long time ago.
Say you have a 10 ft. car and a 10 ft. barn, so the car will just barely fit. Now say the car saw traveling at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light, and you are traveling next to the car, on the line perendicular between the car and the barn. It appears to you that the barn is smaller than 10 ft., and the car won't fit in the barn. Now imagine the same situation, but you are standing next to the barn. The car now looks less than 10ft. long, so it should fit in the barn with room to spare.
I can understand things like simultaniety being an illusion. But how can the car both fit and not fit in the barn? Thanks ahead of time, and I hope this isn't to stupid of a question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not that simultaneity is an illusion, it is just that different frames will disagree. Same with time, time is well-defined in every frame but different frames disagree. So the key to this "paradox" is just that in the barn's frame the rear of the car enters the barn before the front of the car leaves, while in the car's frame the front of the car leaves first.

Here is a more detailed explanation: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/polebarn.html#c1

-Dale
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K