Solving Two Bosons in a Box Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Henk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Box
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving two spinless bosons in a box with periodic boundary conditions. The original poster is tasked with writing the normalized wavefunction for different momentum scenarios and demonstrating a specific inequality related to the wavefunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to construct the wavefunction for two bosons and is exploring the implications of symmetry in their wavefunctions. They raise a question about demonstrating an inequality involving the squared wavefunctions for different momentum states.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in clarifying the original poster's use of LaTeX formatting, with some suggesting alternative ways to present the equations for better readability. The focus remains on the mathematical representation rather than the underlying physics of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be a challenge with LaTeX formatting, which may be hindering clear communication of the mathematical expressions involved in the problem. The original poster is also seeking guidance on a specific inequality without having a complete method outlined.

Henk
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm having some difficulties with the following problem:

Consider two (spinless)free bosons in a box of volume V with periodic boundary conditions. Let the momenta of the bosons be p and q.
a) Write down the normalized wavefunction for p is not equal to q and p = q.

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2)

I thought since they are bosons Y has to be symmetric thus:

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\varphi_{p}(r1)\varphi_{q}(r2)+ \varphi_{p}(r2)\varphi_{q}(r1))

Where


\varphi_{p}(r1)\varphi_{q}(r2) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(e^(i(p \cdot r1))(e^(i(q \cdot r2))


and


\varphi_{p}(r2)\varphi_{q}(r1) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(e^(i(p \cdot r2))(e^(i(q \cdot r1))


For p=q this means:

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(2e^(i(k \cdot (r1+r2)))

b) Show that for p is not equal to q:

\Psi_{pq}(r,r)|^2 > |\Psi_{pp}(r,r)|^2

But I don't know how to do this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to fix your latex.
 
I tried but the weird thing is that it even gives a mistake if I try something simpel as [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
 
try writing it without the [tex]stuff. Then people who know latex can at least read it with a bit of difficulty.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K