Solving x^(2/3)=4: Logarithms or What?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mozart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation x^(2/3) = 4, focusing on the methods and reasoning involved in handling fractional exponents.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between fractional exponents and radicals, questioning the appropriate methods for solving the equation. There is an attempt to clarify the roles of the numerator and denominator in the exponent.

Discussion Status

Some participants have expressed confidence in their approaches, while others are seeking validation of their methods. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem and the steps involved in reaching a solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of fractional exponents and their implications for solving equations, with some uncertainty about the correctness of their methods.

Mozart
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
:frown: I don't remember how to do this x^(2/3)=4 solve for x Do you use logarithm or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to try my best to explain. Whenever you have a fractional exponent, that is another way of talking about a radical...


The "3" in the denominator of the fraction is what "root" your radical will be:

Ex. square root of 2 = 21/2
cubed root of 2 = 21/3

now, the numerator is what power "X" is going to be:

Ex. square root of 21 = 21/2
cubed root of 22 = 22/3

That should hopefully get you started in the right direction...
 
After reading what you said I did the following.

wrote x^2 with the third root around it and made it equal 4.

I then took the square root of 4 to get rid of the square sign on x

I then cubed the 2 and got 8

After pugging the 8 into x^(2/3) I got 4

Please tell me I got the answer using a proper method and this isn't a cruel coincidence. Thanks by the way for the help!
 
Last edited:
Mozart said:
After reading what you said I did the following.
wrote x^2 with the third root around it and made it equal 4.
I then took the square root of 4 to get rid of the square sign on x
I then cubed the 2 and got 8
After pugging the 8 into x^(2/3) I got 4
Please tell me I got the answer using a proper method and this isn't a cruel coincidence. Thanks by the way for the help!

sounds like you did it right.
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K