Solving x'=Ax+g using undetermined coefficients

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 4K views
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Problem #4 from here: http://www.math.washington.edu/~jtittelf/ExtraCredit.pdf


Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



There's only one example of using undetermined coefficients in my textbook. I'm not sure where to start. x = t2a + tb + c ? That's just a ball park guess, since then x' will have just have constant vectors and vectors multiplied by t, like in the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gabbagabbahey said:
I'd start by finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of [tex]\begin{pmatrix}2 & 2 \\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}[/tex]...

Fine. det(AI)=0 ----> (2-ß)*(3-ß)-2*1 = 0 ----> ß2 - 5ß + 4 = 0 ----> (ß-4)(ß-1)=0 ----> ß=4, 1

-----> ß(1) = (1 1)T, B(2)=(-2 1)T

Ah-ha! So I know part of the solution is e4t(1 1)T + et(-2 1)T.

Maybe I assume the full solution is e4t(1 1)T + et(-2 1)T + at2 + bt + c?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
You don't get the zero vector for your first eigenvector...show your calculations for that part

(see edit)
 
Jamin2112 said:
Maybe I assume the full solution is e4t(1 1)T + et(-2 1)T + at2 + bt + c?

Close...I think you want to assume the solution is of the form

[tex]\textbf{x}(t)=c_1e^{4t}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}+c_2e^{t}\begin{pmatrix} -2 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}+\textbf{a}t+\textbf{b}[/tex]

The [itex]c_1[/itex] and [itex]c_2[/itex] are needed since any linear combination of your two independent homogeneous solutions will also be a solution to the homogeneous equation. And I don't think you need a [itex]t^2[/itex] term for your particular solution.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Close...I think you want to assume the solution is of the form

[tex]\textbf{x}(t)=c_1e^{4t}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}+c_2e^{t}\begin{pmatrix} -2 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}+\textbf{a}t+\textbf{b}[/tex]

The [itex]c_1[/itex] and [itex]c_2[/itex] are needed since any linear combination of your two independent homogeneous solutions will also be a solution to the homogeneous equation. And I don't think you need a [itex]t^2[/itex] term for your particular solution.

If you just have at + b then you'll just have a when you take the derivative. Ultimately I'm trying up an x whose derivative looks something like it does in the problem. Right? (t t)T = t(1 1)T.
 
Right, but [tex]\begin{pmatrix}2 & 2 \\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\textbf{x}(t)[/tex] will also have a [itex]t[/itex] in it which should cancel the at for an appropriate choice of a.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Right, but [tex]\begin{pmatrix}2 & 2 \\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\textbf{x}(t)[/tex] will also have a [itex]t[/itex] in it which should cancel the at for an appropriate choice of a.

a and b have constant entries, right?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Keep in mind, that if you get an equation like Ma=-a for some matrix M, either -1 is one of its eigenvalues or a=0:wink:

Thanks, buddy. One more quick question!

On problem 3, I have a 3x3 matrix eigenvalues -2,-1 and corresponding eigenvectors (1 0 0)T and (0 1 0)T. Now, I know what with a 2x2 matrix, if I have only one eigenvector, giving me a solution x=eat$, then I guess a second solution x=teat$ + eat#. With a 3x3 matrix, do I try that with each of my two eigenvectors? Doing so seems to give me a solution for one but not the other.
 
The easiest way to solve problem 3 is to not do it in matrix form...just let [tex]\textbf{x}(t)=\begin{pmatrix}x_1(t) \\ x_2(t) \\ x_3(t) \end{pmatrix}[/tex] and solve the 3 DEs you get.