Graduate Something about configuration manifolds in classical mechanics

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the configuration manifolds in a mechanical system involving a rotating circle of mass M and a sliding bead of mass m. It highlights that when M is greater than zero, the Lagrangian is defined on the tangent bundle Tℝ², while for M equal to zero, it shifts to the tangent bundle TS². The distinction between the toroidal structure T and the spherical structure S is emphasized, noting that T² is not equivalent to S². The conversation raises questions about the definition of the set T and its implications for the system's dynamics. Overall, the relationship between mass and the configuration manifold significantly affects the system's Lagrangian formulation.
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
1,039
I think it could be interesting.

Consider a mechanical system

Screenshot from 2021-02-25 09-30-39.png
A circle of mass M can rotate about the vertical axis. The angle of rotation is coordinated by the angle ##\psi##. A bead of mass m>0 can slide along this circle. The position of the bead relative the circle is given by the angle ##\theta##.

It is interesting to note that if M>0 the Lagrangian of this system is defined on the tangent bundle ##T\mathbb{T}^2##. But if M=0 then the Lagrangian is defined on the tangent bundle ##TS^2##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
how is define the set ##\mathbb{T}##?
 
##\mathbb{T}^n=S^1\times\ldots\times S^1,\quad \mathbb{T}^1=S^1##
but
##S^1\times S^1\ne S^2##!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
985
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K