Space Technology/Exploration Professionals: Who Are They?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thinkies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the roles and titles of professionals involved in space technology and exploration. Participants explore the various specializations within this field, including the collaboration between astronomers and engineers, as well as the nature of their work environments and responsibilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the specific titles for professionals in space technology, such as whether astronomers or engineers are primarily responsible for building satellites and spacecraft.
  • One participant asserts that astronomers and engineers collaborate extensively in the development of space technology, with astronomers defining scientific objectives and engineers handling design and construction.
  • Another participant emphasizes the distinction between commercial satellites and scientific instruments, suggesting that engineers predominantly manage commercial projects while astronomers contribute significantly to scientific missions.
  • A participant describes the process of designing scientific instruments, noting that astronomers often initiate the concepts and proposals, while engineers execute the technical aspects of the projects.
  • There is mention of specific projects, such as the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), highlighting the collaboration between scientists and engineers in large-scale missions.
  • One participant shares their personal experience in an Engineering Physics program, discussing the balance between physics and engineering and the importance of both fields in developing astronomical instruments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the roles of astronomers and engineers in space technology, with some emphasizing collaboration while others highlight the distinct responsibilities of each group. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the hierarchy of roles and the extent of collaboration.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the definitions and responsibilities within the field of space technology, with some assumptions about the roles of different professionals and the nature of their work environments remaining unexamined.

  • #31
Also,how does an astronomy Ph.D degree supplement a master's degree in astronautical engineering? I was just reading an article regarding the phoenix program(mars and all that stuff)and it grew my fascination for astronautical engineering even more (WoW?)^.^.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Here it goes, blame it on my curiosity/excitement for bumping this thread again.

What are the advantages with an M.Eng. degree in astronautical engineering?Is a M.A.Sc degree better?Does the M.A.Sc degree leads to better positions?

Also, is it true that Ph.D simply consist of research, are there any courses that are thought? (Depending on the specialization, right?) So that would mean if I am more of a practical guy in this field, I can simply obtain a M.A.Sc degree and get into, let's say, Lockheed Martin and be part of some programs regarding building a spacecraft or satellites,etc, right?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
*:smile:.*
 
  • #34
MASc is a research oriented degree where you typically do less coursework and there is a thesis component where you do some research and its more of a preparation to do Phd studies. Whereas MEng degrees are more coursework based and usually with a practical project of some kind. Both degress still allow you to do Phd studies or compete for a high end job. The only distinction between the two is what is involved in the curriculum between them. Incidentally, the MASc usually has better funding opportunities while you will most likely pay out of pocket for an MEng.
 
  • #35
Thanks makethings.
 
  • #36
Yeah

Listen, don't take this the wrong way thinkies, but your grammar is quite annoying. Do you purposely make random words plural? I've read a number of your posts since I've been a member, and it's great to see someone as interested in physics studies as you are, but you do seem to purposely warp words. It's good to see someone like yourself so interested in their future, but it's really quite aggravating reading some of your posts.

Does anyone agree? Or am I just being a little rough on the kid?
 
  • #37
undrcvrbro said:
Listen, don't take this the wrong way thinkies, but your grammar is quite annoying. Do you purposely make random words plural? I've read a number of your posts since I've been a member, and it's great to see someone as interested in physics studies as you are, but you do seem to purposely warp words. It's good to see someone like yourself so interested in their future, but it's really quite aggravating reading some of your posts.

Does anyone agree? Or am I just being a little rough on the kid?

I don't purposely make random words plural :smile:. I usually type fast...I'll try to pay more attention to my grammar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K