Space Technology/Exploration Professionals: Who Are They?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thinkies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the roles of professionals in space technology and exploration, specifically distinguishing between astronomers, astrophysicists, and engineers. Astronomers and astrophysicists collaborate with engineers to design and build scientific instruments for space missions, such as the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and SCUBA-2 detectors. While engineers handle the technical aspects of spacecraft design, astronomers define the scientific goals and specifications. The conversation highlights the interdisciplinary nature of space exploration, emphasizing the importance of both scientific and engineering expertise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of astronomy and astrophysics concepts
  • Familiarity with engineering principles related to spacecraft design
  • Knowledge of scientific instrumentation used in space missions
  • Awareness of the roles of organizations like NASA and JPL in space exploration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of engineers in spacecraft design and development
  • Explore the specifics of astronomical instrumentation and its applications
  • Learn about the collaborative processes between scientists and engineers in space missions
  • Investigate educational pathways in Engineering Physics and related fields
USEFUL FOR

Students interested in pursuing careers in space technology, professionals in engineering and astronomy, and anyone seeking to understand the collaborative nature of space exploration projects.

  • #31
Also,how does an astronomy Ph.D degree supplement a master's degree in astronautical engineering? I was just reading an article regarding the phoenix program(mars and all that stuff)and it grew my fascination for astronautical engineering even more (WoW?)^.^.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Here it goes, blame it on my curiosity/excitement for bumping this thread again.

What are the advantages with an M.Eng. degree in astronautical engineering?Is a M.A.Sc degree better?Does the M.A.Sc degree leads to better positions?

Also, is it true that Ph.D simply consist of research, are there any courses that are thought? (Depending on the specialization, right?) So that would mean if I am more of a practical guy in this field, I can simply obtain a M.A.Sc degree and get into, let's say, Lockheed Martin and be part of some programs regarding building a spacecraft or satellites,etc, right?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
*:smile:.*
 
  • #34
MASc is a research oriented degree where you typically do less coursework and there is a thesis component where you do some research and its more of a preparation to do Phd studies. Whereas MEng degrees are more coursework based and usually with a practical project of some kind. Both degress still allow you to do Phd studies or compete for a high end job. The only distinction between the two is what is involved in the curriculum between them. Incidentally, the MASc usually has better funding opportunities while you will most likely pay out of pocket for an MEng.
 
  • #35
Thanks makethings.
 
  • #36
Yeah

Listen, don't take this the wrong way thinkies, but your grammar is quite annoying. Do you purposely make random words plural? I've read a number of your posts since I've been a member, and it's great to see someone as interested in physics studies as you are, but you do seem to purposely warp words. It's good to see someone like yourself so interested in their future, but it's really quite aggravating reading some of your posts.

Does anyone agree? Or am I just being a little rough on the kid?
 
  • #37
undrcvrbro said:
Listen, don't take this the wrong way thinkies, but your grammar is quite annoying. Do you purposely make random words plural? I've read a number of your posts since I've been a member, and it's great to see someone as interested in physics studies as you are, but you do seem to purposely warp words. It's good to see someone like yourself so interested in their future, but it's really quite aggravating reading some of your posts.

Does anyone agree? Or am I just being a little rough on the kid?

I don't purposely make random words plural :smile:. I usually type fast...I'll try to pay more attention to my grammar.
 

Similar threads

Studying How can I combine Astronomy and Technology?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Studying Interested in Astronomy as a Freshman
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
Studying Should I pursue a masters degree after 4.5 years working in IT?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Study aerospace technology in univ (civil engineering)
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Programs Choosing the Best Major for My Passion: Astro/Physics, Computer Science, or AI?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Deciding between Physics or Engineering after a very turbulent year
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Other Master's degree advice to work in the Space Industry
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Studying Advice on Future-Technology Engineering
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Admissions Seeking Feedback on my Physics Personal Statement for Uni Application
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Courses What is it like to work as an Astrophysicist or an Aerospace Engineer?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K