Spacetime distance and ruler-measured length on an XT chart

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KDP
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of spacetime distances on an XT chart, particularly focusing on the differences between ruler-measured lengths and invariant spacetime intervals. Participants explore the implications of these measurements in different reference frames and whether observers can agree on which path has a longer ruler-measured distance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that ruler-measured lengths on the XT chart differ for different observers, suggesting that while one ruler-measured length may be longer in a given frame, it does not imply invariance across all observers.
  • Another participant presents a counterexample where two paths can be perceived differently by observers in different reference frames, challenging the claim that all observers agree on which path is longer based on ruler measurements.
  • A further contribution discusses the symmetry of round trips for two paths, indicating that while one observer may see one path as shorter, the return trip may yield equal lengths for both observers.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the restriction to pairs of paths that travel between common events, which was not initially specified by the original poster.
  • A participant acknowledges the existence of counterexamples to the initial claim, confirming the complexity of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the invariance of ruler-measured lengths across different reference frames, with some providing counterexamples to challenge the initial assertions. The discussion remains unresolved as multiple competing views are presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific path configurations and the assumptions regarding the events being compared. The discussion highlights the complexity of measuring distances in spacetime and the implications of different reference frames.

KDP
Messages
25
Reaction score
7
spacetime.png

With reference to the above diagram, we can see that if we used a ruler to measure the segments on the XT chart and added up all the segment lengths, that this ruler measured length is longer for the craft on the right which experiences the least elapsed proper time. Now unlike the regular spacetime distance (as correctly depicted in the picture) this XT chart ruler length is not invariant and different inertial observers will disagree on its length. However, from a quick check using a few examples in different reference frames, it seems that if one ruler measured chart path is longer than another in a given reference frame, then all observers will agree on which object has the longer XT chart ruler measured distance (Is there a formal name for this measurement?). Is it possible to show that this always the case or are there counter examples?

Just to be clear, I am talking about using the normal Pythagoras method of using $$ \sqrt{T^2 + X^2} $$ to calculate the segment lengths instead of the normal method of using$$\sqrt{T^2-X^2}$$ to calculate the spacetime distance segments.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KDP said:
However, from a quick check using a few examples in different reference frames, it seems that if one ruler measured chart path is longer than another in a given reference frame, then all observers will agree on which object has the longer XT chart ruler measured distance
Consider two paths starting at the origin and ending at ##t=t_1##, ##x=\pm x_1##. The interval along each is ##t_1^2-x_1^2##, but the Euclidean length of either line drawn on the Minkowski diagram can be made longer while the other one is made shorter by a boost opposite directions. So this is a counter example to the claim that all frames agree which worldline has a longer Euclidean representation.
 
Lets call the two paths, A and B and take the case where the first observer sees the two paths as equal and the second observer sees path A as shorter than path B. This is the outward trip. Now if they turn around so that they both return to x=0 at time t1*2, then the return path of A will be longer than that of B and by symmetry the round trip Euclidean lengths of the trips will be equal for the second observer (or any other observer) if they both return to the origin at the same time.
 
The implication of that is tthat you have a restriction not present in your OP, that you are only considering pairs of paths that travel from one common event to another. Is that what you intended?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
Ibix said:
The implication of that is that you have a restriction not present in your OP, that you are only considering pairs of paths that travel from one common event to another. Is that what you intended?
You are right. That is what I intended. Sorry for not making that clear.
 
Last edited:
KDP said:
However, from a quick check using a few examples in different reference frames, it seems that if one ruler measured chart path is longer than another in a given reference frame, then all observers will agree on which object has the longer XT chart ruler measured distance (Is there a formal name for this measurement?). Is it possible to show that this always the case or are there counter examples?

Counter-example (see screenshot):
PF-Euclid.png

Alice moves ##E_0## -> ##E_1##-> ##E_3##.
Bob moves ##E_0## -> ##E_2##-> ##E_3##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KDP and Ibix
Hi Sagittarius. You are right. I checked your figures. There are counter examples. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sagittarius A-Star

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K