Special Relativity and radioactive nucleus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a radioactive nucleus in the lab frame after it emits an alpha particle. The emitted particle moves at a velocity of 6c/7 at an angle of 60 degrees in the nucleus's rest frame, while the lab observer sees it emitted at an angle of 30 degrees. Key equations discussed include the Lorentz transformation for velocity components, specifically u(y)' = u(y)/(γ)(1 - u(x)v/c²) and the relationship between the velocities in different frames. Participants clarify the use of these equations to derive the nucleus's speed accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with velocity addition in different reference frames
  • Knowledge of the behavior of radioactive decay and alpha particle emission
  • Basic proficiency in trigonometry to resolve angles and components
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz transformation equations in detail
  • Learn about velocity addition in special relativity
  • Explore examples of radioactive decay in different reference frames
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the applications of special relativity in particle physics and radioactive decay processes.

Pyrokenesis
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if I could get some guidance regarding the following question:

"A radioactive nucleus, moving in a straight line, decays and emits an alpha particle. In the rest frame of the nucleus, the emitted particle moves with a velocity 6c/7, at an angle of 60 degrees to the direction of motion of the nucleus. If a laboratory experimenter observes the particle to be emitted at an angle of 30 degrees to the original velocity of the nucleus, calculate the speed of the radioactive nucleus in the lab frame."

A nudge in the right direction would be brilliant.

Thanks much,

Pyro...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about:

x'= (x - ut)/√(1 - u2/c2)

y' = y
 
and of course the transformations for t and vx (this is assuming you don't already have the transformation for vy
 
Cheers,

I shall now make an attempt to solve it.
 
I'm still slightly baffled, any further help would be brilliant!

Cheers.
 
Think about the problem in terms of the components of velocity (and as you need only consider two dimensions they are vx, which you should already have the formula for, and vy which you may not have the formula for, but should be able to derive) of the emitted particle in the rest frame of the nucleus and the rest frame of the lab and how they are related.
 
Okay, if u(x) = 6c/7cos(theta) then I think I'm on the right track.

And u(y) = u(y)'.

Thanx.
 
I'm not sure exactly what you want your notaion to mean but I think you may of made a mistake as vy is not equal to vy'.
 
Yes I see that now I was just being slow of brain, however I have an answer now for v using just the values of u(x) and u(x)', and the transformation velocity equation for u(x). Is that the velocity of the S' frame and is it needed?
 
  • #10
I'm trying to work out exactl;y what you've claculated, but get the answer you need to work out an equation relating uy to uy'
 
  • #11
To make it easier for you (though you will probably still need to derive this, if it's not given):

uy' = uy√(1 - vx2/c2)/(1 + uxvx/c2)

In this case u is the velocity of the alpha particle in the rest frame of the lab, u' is the velocity of the alpha particle in the rest frame of the nucleus and v is the velocity of the nucleus in the rest frmae of the lab.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I have an equation:

u(y)' = u(y)/(gamma)(1 - u(x)v/c^2).

Is this the equation?
 
  • #13
Yes the two equations are equivalent,
 
  • #14
Sorry, didnt see your last reply. Our equations look similar (apart from a difference in sign, mine is probably wrong then) and obviously v is the speed of the nucleus which is the moving frame.
 
  • #15
I've just realized, I misread your first post, I thought 6c/7 was the velocity of the nucleus not the alpha particle, anyway it shouldn't matter too much it just means that the answer that I worked out for myself is wrong.
 
  • #16
Thanx for all your help. Should have seen it all along!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
945
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
916
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K