1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

(special relativity)Trajectory under constant ordinary force

  1. May 11, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    A particle is subject to a constant force F on +x direction. At t = 0, it is located at origin with velocity vo in +y direction.

    2. Relevant equations

    Determine the trajectory of the particle. x(t),y(t),z(t)

    3. The attempt at a solution

    [tex]\vec{p}= \int \vec{F} dt[/tex]
    [tex]\vec{p} = \vec{F}t + constant[/tex]

    At t=0
    [tex]\vec{p} = \gamma mv_{o}[/tex]
    [tex]\vec{p} = Ft\hat{x} + \gamma mv_{o}\hat{y}[/tex]

    what should I do next? should I integral over [tex]p_{x}[/tex] and [tex]p_{y}[/tex] separately? Is that so, what are the exact steps?

    I tried using
    [tex] p_{x} = \frac{mu_{x}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}}{c^{2}}}} = Ft[/tex]
    [tex]x(t) = \frac{mc^{2}}{F} (\sqrt{1+\frac{Ft}{mc}^{2}} -1) [/tex]

    what about y(t)? it seems it is a linear with t. I don't know where I get wrong.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. May 11, 2010 #2

    gabbagabbahey

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    [itex]\gamma[/itex] involves [itex]u^2[/itex], not just the x-component of the velocity:wink:
     
  4. May 11, 2010 #3
    Do you mean I have to use
    [tex]\frac{mu_{x}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}+u^{2}_{y}}{c^{2}}}} = Ft[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{mu_{y}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}+u^{2}_{y}}{c^{2}}}} = \gamma mu_{o}[/tex]

    and solve these coupling equations?
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2010
  5. May 11, 2010 #4

    gabbagabbahey

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

  6. May 11, 2010 #5
    Do I have another way, because there will be messy if I solve the coupling and then take the integral.
    Would Lorentz's transform help me to simplify the process?
     
  7. May 11, 2010 #6
    Using L.T. s.t. [tex]\bar{S}[/tex] is moving in y-direction with [tex]u_{o}[/tex]

    [tex]\bar{F_{x}}=\gamma F[/tex]
    [tex]\bar{F_{y}}=0[/tex]
    [tex]\bar{F_{z}}=0[/tex]

    [tex]\bar{u_{x}}=0[/tex]
    [tex]\bar{u_{y}}=0[/tex]
    [tex]\bar{u_{z}}=0[/tex]

    Is this correct?
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2010
  8. May 11, 2010 #7
    I think my L.T. transform got some problems since the answer is too simple..
    Can anyone give a hand?
     
  9. May 12, 2010 #8
    I just sketch the method I used.
    First use
    [tex]\frac{d\gamma mu_{x}}{dt}=F_{x}=F[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{d\gamma mu_{y}}{dt}=0[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{d\gamma mu_{z}}{dt}=0[/tex]

    Then shows z is always zero
    Hence the [tex]u^{2}[/tex] in the [tex]\gamma[/tex] becomes [tex]u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2}[/tex]

    Afterwards, integrated out [tex]u_{x}[/tex] and [tex]u_{y}[/tex]
    decouple the equation s.t. one involves only [tex]u_{x}[/tex] and other [tex]u_{y}[/tex]
    integrate it again, you will get the answer
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2010
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?