Undergrad Special Theory of Relativity & Conservation of Mass

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the law of conservation of mass conflicts with the first postulate of the special theory of relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames. It suggests that the definition of "mass" is crucial to this understanding. The consensus is that if mass is conserved in one inertial reference frame, it remains conserved in all frames, indicating no conflict exists. Participants encourage further clarification of thoughts to enhance the discussion. Overall, the law of conservation of mass aligns with the principles of relativity.
Sonuz
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends how you're defining "mass".
 
As with your last thread, if you explain your thinking a bit more we'll be able to give more helpful answers.
 
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
Conservation means does not change over time. What the first postulate would say is:

If mass is conserved in one inertial reference frame, then it is conserved in them all.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes robphy, vanhees71 and Ibix
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
No. Why do you think it might conflict?
 

Thread 'Can a Gyroscope in a Satellite Detect Orbit?'

Einstein said, when describing someone falling off a building, that the Earth accelerating up to meet him/her. Without the Earth getting larger in all directions as the paradox goes, it curvature of space-time which is why you can have the acceleration up without the surface moving up as you follow a geodesic path. Any deviation from that geodesic will requires a force which is what causes you to have weight on a scale on earth. However, what if we consider an orbiting satellite which is...
View full post »

Similar threads

Undergrad Charge conservation and special relativity
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Undergrad Noether's second theorem: two questions
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Graduate A global energy conservation law in general relativity
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Undergrad Does the metric in general relativity depend only on position because of the equivalence principle?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Undergrad SR textbooks discussing accelerated reference frames without delving into GR
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Undergrad Constants of motion symmetric spacetimes
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Undergrad Conservation of momentum in a collision
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
Undergrad Symmetry of motion in the special theory of relativity
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Undergrad Energy conservation in general relativity
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Undergrad Does string theory falsify the theory of special relativity?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K