Speed of Light: Questions Answered

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the constancy of the speed of light across different inertial frames of reference and the implications of this constancy on the experience of time for photons. Participants explore the foundational experiments and theories that support these concepts, as well as address common misunderstandings related to the nature of light and time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the constancy of the speed of light for all observers in different inertial frames is concluded, seeking clarification on the experimental basis for this claim.
  • Another participant references various experiments, including the Michelson-Morley experiment, as evidence for the speed of light's constancy.
  • Some participants mention that the laws of electricity and magnetism suggest the speed of light should be invariant across inertial frames, citing historical context from Maxwell's equations.
  • There is a challenge regarding the assertion that photons do not experience time, with some participants stating this is a common misunderstanding and referencing a FAQ for further clarification.
  • One participant attempts to understand why the claim about photons and time is incorrect, indicating a desire for deeper insight into the reasoning behind this assertion.
  • Another participant explains that the infinite time dilation result derived from the time dilation equation is a mathematical error when applied to light, as there is no inertial frame where light is at rest.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of time as experienced by photons, with some asserting that the claim is incorrect while others seek clarification on this point. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of this misunderstanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference historical experiments and theoretical frameworks without fully resolving the implications of these discussions on the nature of light and time. There are mentions of FAQs and older threads that may provide additional context but are not fully explored in this thread.

king123
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
About the manifestation speed of light?
Yess! speed of light it's driving me crazy. I know it might sound too noob and silly but please enlighten me, First of all how does we concluded that speed of light is constant for every observer in all possible inertial frames of reference. Next thing how come a photon doesn't experience time,if I assumed and considered it as an event of emission and absorption of a single photon(I heard about the relativistic effects on different observers ,does that means that photon can't possibly know that it's been emitted and absorbed),as far as I know events are generally based on time. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
king123 said:
Summary:: About the manifestation speed of light?

First of all how does we concluded that speed of light is constant for every observer in all possible inertial frames of reference
Basically we built experiments of many different designs that were designed to measure the change in the speed of light in different reference frames. They all came back with the same constant with no change in different frames. It isn't something that we just invented, it was a fact in the data that we had to adapt our theories to include.
 
king123 said:
First of all how does we concluded that speed of light is constant for every observer in all possible inertial frames of reference.
There is a ton of experimental evidence, starting with the Michelson-Morley experiment in the late 19th century. Some of this evidence is described in the sticky thread at the top of this forum on experimental evidence for relativity.

Even before this experiment, nature had already given us a big hint that the speed of light might well behave that way. James Maxwell was able to calculate the speed of light from the laws of electricity and magnetism in 1865. Those laws are the same in all inertial frames (you don’t observe any differences in how electricity works between noon and midnight even though the rotation of the Earth is changing your speed in every inertial frame) so the the speed of light ought to be as well. Indeed, the disconnect between this prediction of E&M and the commonsense expectation that the speed of light would be not be the same in all inertial frames (all other speeds behave that way) was the great unsolved problem of 19th century physics, until Einstein discovered special relativity. There’s much discussion in many older threads here.
Next thing how come a photon doesn't experience time,
That’s just plain incorrect, although the misunderstanding is so common that we have a FAQ about it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Nugatory said:
That’s just plain incorrect, although the misunderstanding is so common that we have a FAQ about it.
Can you please provide me an insight about why it's incorrect, because if it's incorrect I want to know why? To make myself clear
 
king123 said:
Can you please provide me an insight about why it's incorrect, because if it's incorrect I want to know why? To make myself clear
Someone will post up a link to the FAQ in a moment and we have many older threads on the subject (like I said, it’s a common misunderstanding).

My quick answer is that you got that “time doesn’t pass for a photon” result by plugging ##v=c## into the time dilation equation and seeing infinite time dilation come out. However, the time dilation formula only works between things that are at rest in different inertial frames - and there is no inertial frame in which light is at rest. The infinite time dilation result is just another division by zero error, the way the math tells you that you’ve made a mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
High School Light & Time
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
603
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K