Speed of longitudinal wave 30 times the speed of a transverse wave?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the stress in a stretched wire such that the speed of longitudinal waves is 30 times that of transverse waves, involving concepts of Young's modulus and wave speeds in different media.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the speeds of longitudinal and transverse waves, questioning the validity of equations presented and the assumptions made regarding wave behavior.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the equations and their applicability are being explored. Some participants offer hints and corrections regarding the equations for wave speeds, while others express confusion about the relationships and calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the definitions and relationships between the variables used in the equations, as well as the implications of the problem statement on the behavior of the waves.

PirateFan308
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What must be the stress (F/A) in a stretched wire of a material whose Young's modulus is Y for the speed of longitudinal waves to equal 30 times the speed of transverse waves?


Homework Equations


Y=\frac{Fl_0}{Al}

v_L=f\lambda = \sqrt{F/\mu}

v_T = \omega A sin(kx-\omega t)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that v_L=30v_T but my main problem is that longitudinal velocity remains constant while transverse velocity is dependent on position and time, making it impossible for one to be a multiple of the other unless they are both equal to 0, which cannot be the case. I'm not sure what I'm missing ... thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PirateFan308 said:

Homework Statement


What must be the stress (F/A) in a stretched wire of a material whose Young's modulus is Y for the speed of longitudinal waves to equal 30 times the speed of transverse waves?

those are irrevelant equations that u are using...the question says speed of transverse wave not transverse velocity of particle
 
PirateFan308 said:

Homework Equations


Y=\frac{Fl_0}{Al}

v_L=f\lambda = \sqrt{F/\mu}

v_T = \omega A sin(kx-\omega t)




these equations are not written correct. You haven't written the formula for speed of longitudnal wave. The formula written is for the speed of transverse wave instead of longitudnal wave. The formula written for speed of Transverse wave is the formulae for "transverse velocity of particle".
 
darkxponent said:
these equations are not written correct. You haven't written the formula for speed of longitudnal wave. The formula written is for the speed of transverse wave instead of longitudnal wave. The formula written for speed of Transverse wave is the formulae for "transverse velocity of particle".

Is v_T = \lambda f = \sqrt{F/\mu} and v_L = \frac{Y}{\rho} correct?
 
PirateFan308 said:
Is v_T = \lambda f = \sqrt{F/\mu} and v_L = \frac{Y}{\rho} correct?


Hint:
You have missed a square root.
 
emailanmol said:
Hint:
You have missed a square root.

v_L = \sqrt{\frac{Y}{\rho}}??
 
So if v_L=\sqrt{Y/\rho} and v_t=\sqrt{F/\mu} then

\sqrt{Y/\rho}=30\sqrt{F/\mu} which is equivalent to Y=\frac{900F\rho}{\mu}

Y=\frac{Fl_0}{Al}

so \frac{F}{A}=\frac{Yl}{l_0}=\frac{900Fl\rho}{l_0 \mu}

but l\rho = A and \mu = \frac{mass}{length} ~~so~~\mu l_0=mass

so \frac{F}{A}=\frac{mass}{900AF} ~~so~~F^2=\frac{mass}{900}

which doesn't work ...

I also tried it a different way, letting v_T=fλ so that Y=900v^2\rho so then \frac{F}{A}=\frac{Yl}{l_0} = \frac{900v^2\rho l}{l_0} = \frac{900v^2A^2}{l_0} which also doesn't work. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Skip the step where you have got in Y=FL/AL(0).

You have no way of relating L and L(0).

Also Lp=A is not right.

p=M/V sp Lp=LM/V.
But here L is change in length.
So you can't write V=AL as L is change in length.So this doesn't help.


Just focus on your relation
Y/p=900F/u.

Divide it by A on both sides

Y/Ap=900F/Au.

So F/A=Yu/900Ap

Is there any way you can find out what u/Ap is ?
( Hint:You have applied a relation between u and l in your last post.That might help)
 
I got it - thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K