- #1

- 11

- 0

My Question is:

What is speed of moon relative to Earth without the gravitational pull of the sun and hence the isolated length of the lunar orbit?

Thank you.

- Thread starter SpeedofLight
- Start date

- #1

- 11

- 0

My Question is:

What is speed of moon relative to Earth without the gravitational pull of the sun and hence the isolated length of the lunar orbit?

Thank you.

- #2

- 10

- 0

can be approximated as the average distance between apogee and perigee (2 *pi *((a+p)/2 )) / (time of revolution in what? seconds?)

(assuming perigee and apogee are measure as a radius)

I say approximated because it's also moving away at 32mm/year ...

(assuming perigee and apogee are measure as a radius)

I say approximated because it's also moving away at 32mm/year ...

Last edited:

- #3

- 11

- 0

V = 2 * pi * R / T where

R = radius of moon revolution(the average distance between apogee and perigee)=384264 km

T = 27.321661 synodic days = 655.71986 hours

Moon speed (around the Earth) isn't the same with and without Sun'gravitationnal effects.

- #4

- 15,393

- 685

- #5

- 10

- 0

- #6

- 15,393

- 685

The effect is not zero.what goes up must come down - 50% of the orbit is slowed by the sun 50% is increased by the sun - so +50%-50%=0%.

- #7

- 10

- 0

sure it is, otherwise for the past thousands of years the moon wouldn't have had the same period - at any given point on the path it's not a constant velocity, but overall, is it a significant amount that the average is not +0 from the sun's gravitation?

And if there wasn't a sun, wouldn't it have to maintain the same average velocity (so the sun would have to disappear at 1 of two particular moments to have it even remotely work)

Actually in retrospect, even then, the moon's orbit would be translated from correct to orbit the earth alone, so the moon would have to be shifted too... just really not practical to even consider

And if there wasn't a sun, wouldn't it have to maintain the same average velocity (so the sun would have to disappear at 1 of two particular moments to have it even remotely work)

Actually in retrospect, even then, the moon's orbit would be translated from correct to orbit the earth alone, so the moon would have to be shifted too... just really not practical to even consider

Last edited:

- #8

- 15,393

- 685

The same period assure it is, otherwise for the past thousands of years the moon wouldn't have had the same period ...

The calculation to determine what the orbital period of the Moon would be ignoring the presence of the Sun is fairly simple. I do not want to say what exactly that calculation is because this looks a homework problem. I have no qualms in saying this: The result of that calculation is not 655.71986 hours.

- #9

- 11

- 0

ø = (360 degrees / 365.2421987 synodic days) x 27.32166088 synodic days = 26.92952225 degrees. So,the speed of moon without Sun gravity should be like this:

V = (2 * pi * R / T)*cos[26.92952225]

Is this CORRECT?

- #10

- 15,393

- 685

Assuming no other bodies are present, Newton's law of gravity yields an equation for the period of a pair of bodies orbiting their common center of mass. You need to use that equation.

- #11

- 11

- 0

I was reading this website: Crackpot link deleted

and I found that the Moon would revolve around the Earth at 3279 km/h without Sun influence on Earth-Moon system. Tell me what do you say with this?

and I found that the Moon would revolve around the Earth at 3279 km/h without Sun influence on Earth-Moon system. Tell me what do you say with this?

Last edited by a moderator:

- #12

- 15,393

- 685

I would say nonsense. The calculation is easy. Try it.

- #13

- 11

- 0

- #14

- 15,393

- 685

Try the calculation. It is not hard.

- #15

Chronos

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 11,408

- 741

- #16

- 17

- 0

Can't you just treat it as a one planet system with a sun whose mass is equal to the mass of the earth and the mass of the planet is equal to the mass of the moon?

- #17

- 15,393

- 685

No, you can't. Gravity doesn't work that way in general. You can treat objects with a spherical mass distribution (objects whose density varies only with radial distance from the center of mass of the object) as point masses, but in general you cannot treat an arbitrary collection as a point mass.Can't you just treat it as a one planet system with a sun whose mass is equal to the mass of the earth and the mass of the planet is equal to the mass of the moon?

Besides, that is not the question raised in the original post. That asked what the period of the Moon's orbit about the Earth would be in the absence of the Sun. That is an easy calculation to make. Since the OP won't do it, here it is:

[tex]P = 2\pi\,\sqrt{\frac {a^3}{G(M_e+M_m)}} = 2\pi\,\sqrt{\frac {a^3}{GM_e(1+M_m/M_e)}}[/tex]

Plugging in the numbers,

That 53.40 minute discrepancy is about 0.136% of the true synodic period. Rather small, but very much observable. So what explains this discrepancy? Simple: This calculation ignores the effects of the Sun, which are obviously of a perturbative nature given that the simplistic calculation comes pretty close to the mark.

A frame with its origin at the Earth-Moon barycenter is not an inertial frame. The Earth and Moon are orbiting the Sun. We can pretend it is an inertial frame by accounting for the acceleration of the frame toward the Sun as a fictitious force. With this, the gravitational force exerted by the Sun becomes a tidal gravitational force (physics term) or a third body effect (solar system dynamics term).

The resultant forces will be quite similar to those depicted in this diagram from the wikipedia article on tides. Interpret the arrow as pointing to the Sun and interpret the circle as representing the Moon's orbit about the Earth:

Note that the tidal forces are directed outward when the Moon is new and when it is full. The forces are directed inward when the Moon is at first and last quarters, but the magnitude of this inward force is about half that of the outward force when the Moon is new or full. The net effect is outward, equivalent to a small reduction in the combined mass of the Earth and the Moon. This makes the Earth-Moon period a bit longer than that calculated assuming a two body problem value.

- #18

- 11

- 0

if i remove sun gravity and earth gravity from the moon, what is the equation should I use to find the speed of the moon??(so the moon is walking on straight line.)

Thank you.

- #19

- 15,393

- 685

You are asking a nonsense question.

- #20

- 11

- 0

If there is no gravity,then there is no speed ?

if these nonsense questions,sorry...

- #21

russ_watters

Mentor

- 20,139

- 6,663

- #22

- 121

- 0

TM

- #23

- 1,384

- 2

No need to apologise. It's not at all obvious. In fact, it took the best minds of the world thousands of years to figure this out!

If there is no gravity,then there is no speed ?

if these nonsense questions,sorry...

If there was no gravity or any other external force acting on the moon, it's velocity would be constant. This means that it its speed would never change, and nor would the direction it was travelling in.

What would it's speed be? Any fraction of the speed of light you like. If you call it zero, it will stay zero. If you call it half of the speed of light, it will stay half of the speed of light. It's only meaningful to say how velocity changes, or what the difference is between two velocities. There's no objective answer to the question "what is the original speed (or velocity) of the moon".

It's like asking which direction is "up" in space, or which direction is "north" or "forward". We can call any direction we like "up". It doesn't make any physical difference. One direction is as good as another. One velocity is as good as another. They're arbitrary human labels. There's no physical experiment we could do that would tell us which is the best direction to attach the label "up" to, or which velocity is the best to call 0. It's just a matter of convenience.

- #24

- 11

- 0

There are two types of moon's speed:

1) Relative speed to earth, which can be calculated with the following formula:

v = 2 * pi * R / T

where R is radius of moon revolution = 384400 km

and T is the period of moon's revolution = 655.7179 hours

v = 2 * 3.14 * 384400/655.7179 = 3683.377 km/hr

2) Relative speed to star or universe. This is what I need.

In my opinion, the moon makes 360 degrees around Earth with respect to stars the Earth-moon system moves 26.92952225 degrees around the sun. We can calculate ø from the period of one heliocentric revolution of the Earth-moon system (365.2421987 days):

ø = (360 degrees / 365.2421987 synodic days) x 27.32166088 synodic days = 26.92952225 degrees

then V = (2 * pi * R / T)*cos[26.92952225] = speed of moon relative to star or universe.

If this is wrong, please help me to find speed of moon relative to star or universe.

Thank you.

- #25

jimgraber

Gold Member

- 247

- 18

SpeedofLight,

There are two types of moon's speed:

1) Relative speed to earth, which can be calculated with the following formula:

v = 2 * pi * R / T

where R is radius of moon revolution = 384400 km

and T is the period of moon's revolution = 655.7179 hours

v = 2 * 3.14 * 384400/655.7179 = 3683.377 km/hr

2) Relative speed to star or universe. This is what I need.

In my opinion, the moon makes 360 degrees around Earth with respect to stars the Earth-moon system moves 26.92952225 degrees around the sun. We can calculate ø from the period of one heliocentric revolution of the Earth-moon system (365.2421987 days):

ø = (360 degrees / 365.2421987 synodic days) x 27.32166088 synodic days = 26.92952225 degrees

then V = (2 * pi * R / T)*cos[26.92952225] = speed of moon relative to star or universe.

If this is wrong, please help me to find speed of moon relative to star or universe.

Thank you.

I would call your number 2 the speed of the moon relative to the sun. It needs some work depending on where the moon is in its orbit relative to the sun. You need to take the vector sum of the moons speed relative to the earth and the earth's speed relative to the sun.

Next you need to do calculation three and figure out the suns speed relative to the center of the milky way galaxy and do another vector sum.

Finally, you need to find the milky way's speed relative to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and do a fourth vector sum. Or you can combine steps 3 and 4 and just add in the sun's speed relative to the CMBC.

In layman's terms you could call that the moon's speed relative to the universe.

Note that this speed is not constant, but changes with time in both magnitude and direction.

There are lot's of smart people here who can tell you why that is not quite right, or is at least definition dependent. But it's a reasonable first cut at the speed of the moon relative to the universe. Note also that this is the speed *with* gravity, not the speed *without* gravity. Also it includes not only the Sun's gravity, but other gravitational sources as well.

Best.

Jim Graber