Speed of moth related to Doppler Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Doppler Effect in calculating the speed of a moth as it interacts with sound waves emitted by a bat. The initial calculations yield a speed of 6.1 m/s, while the answer key states the speed should be 12 m/s. Participants highlight the importance of considering the angle of the moth's flight, suggesting that an angle of 60° may have been omitted from the problem statement, which could account for the discrepancy in the results. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of clarifying assumptions in physics problems to achieve accurate solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler Effect
  • Basic knowledge of sound wave propagation
  • Familiarity with solving equations involving relative velocity
  • Ability to interpret physics problems with missing information
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of the Doppler Effect for sound waves
  • Study the impact of angles on relative velocity in wave mechanics
  • Explore examples of Doppler Effect applications in real-world scenarios
  • Learn how to clarify assumptions in physics problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching wave mechanics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of the Doppler Effect in sound analysis.

songoku
Messages
2,508
Reaction score
402
Homework Statement
Sound wave produced by a bat has a frequency of 222 kHz and wavelength of ##1.5 x 10^{-3}## m. A stationary bat sends out a sound signal and receives the same signal reflected from a moving moth at a frequency of 230.3 kHz. Calculate the magnitude of the velocity of the moth, assuming that the velocity is constant
Relevant Equations
Doppler Effect
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect.

(1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth

Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s

Frequency received by moth:
$$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$

(2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat

Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer):
$$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$
$$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$

Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is 12 m/s

Where is my mistake?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both, the stationary bat and the moving moth, receive sound of the same frequency.
That common frequency is greater than the frequency of the sound emitted by the bat.
It is the relative velocity of both creatures what reduces the distances between two consecutive crests of the sound wave, regardless which one is moving.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Lnewqban said:
Both, the stationary bat and the moving moth, receive sound of the same frequency.
You mean both bat and moth will detect frequency of 230.3 kHz?
 
Lnewqban said:
Both, the stationary bat and the moving moth, receive sound of the same frequency.
Not so.
 
songoku said:
the answer key is 12 m/s
Well, it doesn’t say the moth is flying directly towards the bat. Perhaps it was supposed to tell you it was flying at an angle of 60° to the direct route?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
Well, it doesn’t say the moth is flying directly towards the bat. Perhaps it was supposed to tell you it was flying at an angle of 60° to the direct route?
How can we get this information from the question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gavran
songoku said:
How can we get this information from the question?
Assuming that's not rhetorical...

You can’t. But there’s a possibility that a 60° angle was accidentally omitted from the question - this would explain official answer.

What you can do, at the start of your answer, is to make clear any assumption(s) you need to make.

E.g. “No information is supplied about the direction of the moth’s velocity. I will assume that we need to find the magnitude of the radial component of the moth’s velocity.”
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Thank you very much for all the explanations Lnewqban, Gavran, haruspex, Steve4Physics
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K