Doppler effect with frequency ratio

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the Doppler effect in a scenario involving sound frequencies. The context involves a composer who wants to manipulate sound frequencies as a bat flies towards a singer, with the goal of achieving a specific frequency ratio between the sound heard by the audience and the singer's voice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate equations to use for the Doppler effect, specifically questioning the correct forms of the equations based on the direction of motion. There are attempts to calculate the speed of the bat needed to achieve the desired frequency shift, with various participants sharing their results and questioning the accuracy of their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing corrections to each other's equations and calculations. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the signs and forms of the Doppler equations. Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their answers and the implications of significant digits.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is from an online homework platform, which imposes specific requirements for answer submission, such as including proper units. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the interpretation of negative values in the context of direction.

wolfsrain159
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An avant-garde composer wants to use the Doppler effect in his new opera. As the soprano sings, he wants a large bat to fly toward her from the back of the stage. The bat will be outfitted with a microphone to pick up the singer's voice and a loudspeaker to rebroadcast the sound toward the audience. The composer wants the sound the audience hears from the bat to be, in musical terms, one half-step higher in frequency than the note they are hearing from the singer. Two notes a half-step apart have a frequency ratio of 2^(1/12) = 1.059.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I used f' = (c/c + Vs)f and f' = (c/c-Vs) because I was unsure which one to use. I plugged in c = 340 m/s and just divided f'/f and had that equal the frequency ratio. I kept getting answers like 19 m/s and 20 m/s but that isn't right
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
wolfsrain159 said:
I used f' = (c/c + Vs)f and f' = (c/c=Vs)
You mean f'= c/(c-Vs).
One way to remember which to use is to consider the boundary case where the source is moving at speed c. The sound waves move with the source, piling up as an unlimited number of wavefronts at its leading edge. So when the source arrives at the receiver, all waves are heard in an instant, i.e. an infinite frequency. So it must be the c/(c-...) form.
I agree with 19m/s, or nearly. Do you know what the 'book' answer is? Could it be a matter of significant digits?

Edit: ouch - I got myself confused. I explained how to figure out which to use, then used the wrong one.
The correct conclusion is that it should be the "+" form. (Thanks, Doc Al.). But your equation for that case is inverted.
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
You mean f'= c/(c-Vs).
One way to remember which to use is to consider the boundary case where the source is moving at speed c. The sound waves move with the source, piling up as an unlimited number of wavefronts at its leading edge. So when the source arrives at the receiver, all waves are heard in an instant, i.e. an infinite frequency. So it must be the c/(c-...) form.
I agree with 19m/s, or nearly. Do you know what the 'book' answer is? Could it be a matter of significant digits?
Thank you for correcting that, I made a typo. This problem is from my online homework and the only instructions it says is to enter the answer with the proper units, which for velocity is m/s. Other then that I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. Using the second form c/(c-...) I got 19.098 m/s but I had already entered 19 m/s and 19.1 m/s and it said both were incorrect.
 
(1) What frequency does the bat observe and retransmit?
(2) What frequency does the audience observe emitted by the bat?
 
wolfsrain159 said:
Using the second form c/(c-...) I
Please see my edit at post #2.
 
haruspex said:
Please see my edit at post #2.
Using the other form c/(c+...) I got -19.1, which I'm assuming is negative for the direction. However, usually the online program will let you know if your sign is incorrect and it didn't say anything about it. I just don't want to use all my tries if it is still "incorrect"
 
wolfsrain159 said:
Using the other form c/(c+...) I got -19.1, which I'm assuming is negative for the direction. However, usually the online program will let you know if your sign is incorrect and it didn't say anything about it. I just don't want to use all my tries if it is still "incorrect"
Did you read the last sentence of my updated post #2? It was a second edit, so you might have missed it.
 
haruspex said:
Did you read the last sentence of my updated post #2? It was a second edit, so you might have missed it.
so would I use (c+Vs)/c = f' ?
 
wolfsrain159 said:
so would I use (c+Vs)/c = f' ?
Yes.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Yes.
I got 20.247 using that equation and 20 m/s was marked incorrect. Would I inverse f' as well? Like use 1/1.0595 instead?
 
  • #11
wolfsrain159 said:
I got 20.247 using that equation and 20 m/s was marked incorrect. Would I inverse f' as well? Like use 1/1.0595 instead?
It gives me 20.217. But that only arranges that the frequency picked up by the bat is a half step higher. Note Doc Al's second question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K