Speed of sound as the sqrt(elasticity/density) and why it must always be < C

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of sound in a medium is defined by the equation sqrt(elasticity/density) and must always be less than the speed of light due to relativistic effects. As particles in a wavefront approach relativistic speeds, their effective mass increases, causing density to approach infinity, which alters the propagation characteristics of sound. The discussion highlights the necessity of using full relativistic equations when dealing with high pressures and unique equations of state. Further exploration of perfect fluids and their behavior under these conditions is suggested for a deeper understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave propagation in physics
  • Familiarity with elasticity and density concepts
  • Knowledge of relativistic physics and mass-energy equivalence
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of sound speed in perfect fluids
  • Study the implications of relativistic effects on wave propagation
  • Explore advanced equations of state under high pressure
  • Learn about Hooke's law and its application to wave mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students interested in wave mechanics, fluid dynamics, and the effects of relativity on sound propagation.

pyrotix
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The question in the title. Speed of sound in a medium obviously must be less than the speed of light. Speed of sound is usually given by the equation sqrt(c/p). Wondering what causes this to always be less than the speed of light.

Gar. Just realized something as I'm typing this. Now that I think about it, in the relativistic limit the equation would be different. As the particles in the wavefront started moving at a speed close to the speed of light they would gain mass. As they approached the speed of light the density would approach infinity.

I think I'll try and derive out what the actual equation is.

Leaving this up here in case people have interesting comments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An interesting question this one. The particles traveling at relativistic speeds won't save you! Linear waves can have an amplitude as small as you like and still propagate at the same speed, so the speed of individual particles can be made tiny. As you say, you have to use full relativistic equations, and these will be important if you've got some really amazing equation of state with massive pressures or something. I'm not quite sure exactly what it is physically that'll save us. I guess the best way to work it out is to do perfect fluids first and see what happens. I might do a calculation later; I'll post what I find.
 
after thinking about it you're right. I got confused. The speed of particles depends on du/dt and can -> 0 without any effect on the c^2 term.

Maybe the trick is when doing the hooke's law derivation of the wave is to compensate for the fact that the "springs" do not react instantly but only at the speed of light.

Atlernately there might be some density elasticity dependency that saves you.

I'll think about it some more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
670
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
19K