Speed of Sound Lab (using slope to find speed of sound)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of sound using tuning forks and water tubes, specifically through the relationship between frequency and wavelength. The formula for speed of sound is established as Speed of Sound = frequency * wavelength (λ). Participants suggest plotting wavelength (λ) against the inverse of frequency (1/f) to derive the speed of sound from the slope of the resulting linear fit. Additionally, the need to differentiate the equation for velocity of sound is highlighted, prompting further exploration of calculus in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave properties, specifically frequency and wavelength.
  • Familiarity with the speed of sound formula: Speed of Sound = frequency * wavelength (λ).
  • Basic proficiency in using Excel for data analysis and graphing.
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly differentiation techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to plot data in Excel and perform linear regression analysis.
  • Study the relationship between frequency and wavelength in wave mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of differentiation in calculus, focusing on applications in physics.
  • Investigate the implications of temperature on the speed of sound using the formula Speed of Sound = 331 + 0.61(T).
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching wave mechanics, and anyone interested in experimental methods for measuring sound speed.

goman519
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you had data from a lot of different frequencies, how could you use a slope to find the speed of sound? Explain in detail.

Given/Known: So basically we did a lab where we used 3 different tuning forks and hit them over a tube filled with water. We recorded where we heard each node and calculated what half lambda and lamda were in order to find the speed of sound.


Homework Equations



Speed of Sound = frequency * wavelength (lambda)
or
Speed of Sound = 331 + 0.61(T)
T = temperature in celsius (which was 20.2 in our class room)


The Attempt at a Solution



Tried taking the slope of my 3 frequencies (523.2, 1024, 2048 (Hz)) and 3 wavelengths (634.67, 316.00, 152.00 (mm) respectively) in excel. First converted the wavelengths to meters. The slope I got was -2.91. Couldn't figure out any correlation and frankly don't think that's the way to approach the problem.


Solution or any kind of tip very much appreciated. Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expected relationship between the frequency and wavelength is one of inverse proportion

\lambda = \frac{v_s}{f}.

The speed of sound v_s could be computed from the slope of a fit to the data where you plot \lambda vs. 1/f, instead of \lambda vs. f.
 
fzero said:
The expected relationship between the frequency and wavelength is one of inverse proportion

\lambda = \frac{v_s}{f}.

The speed of sound v_s could be computed from the slope of a fit to the data where you plot \lambda vs. 1/f, instead of \lambda vs. f.

Ok cool. I see how that works and when I got the slope I had a very small percent error so thanks.

Only thing is, my teacher emailed me about the question and told me to differentiate the equation for velocity of sound. To look at dy/dx. I'm not really sure how to do that correctly.

Wouldn't differentiating V=lambda F give you 1 = lambda + F ? Any idea what she wants me to do?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K