Calculating Speed of Sound in Nickel using Atomic Properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of sound in nickel using its atomic properties and Young's modulus. The calculations involve determining the density of nickel, the mass of individual atoms, and the interatomic spring stiffness. The final speed of sound calculated was 4539 m/s, leading to a time of 0.000537505 seconds for sound to travel through a 2.44 m nickel bar. The initial miscalculation was corrected by accurately computing Young's modulus, which resolved the discrepancy in the final answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's modulus and its application in material science
  • Knowledge of atomic properties, including atomic mass and density
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations related to wave propagation
  • Ability to perform unit conversions and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Young's modulus in different materials
  • Learn about the relationship between density and speed of sound in solids
  • Explore the concept of interatomic forces and their impact on material properties
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on the speed of sound in metals
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or materials science, engineers working with metal properties, and anyone interested in the acoustic characteristics of materials.

jhyrman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From WebAssign:
One mole of nickel (6.02e23 atoms) has a mass of 59 g, and its density is 8.9 g/cm3. You have a bar of nickel 2.44 m long, with a square cross section, 1.8 mm on a side. You hang the rod vertically and attach a 45 kg mass to the bottom, and you observe that the bar becomes 1.6 mm longer. Next you remove the 45 kg mass, place the rod horizontally, and strike one end with a hammer. How much time T will elapse before a microphone at the other end of the bar will detect a disturbance? (Assume a simple cubic lattice for nickel.)

Homework Equations


Young's modulus, diameter of an atom, v=ωd

The Attempt at a Solution


tl;dr - I'm getting 0.000538 seconds, not the right answer.

Atomic Size and Mass:

1) convert given density to kg/m^3 = 8900kg/m^3
2) convert to moles/m^3 (kg/m^3 * mol/kg) = 150847 mol/m^3 (not rounding in my actual calculations)
3) convert to atoms/m^3 (6.022^23 atoms/mol) = 9.084e28 atoms/m^3
4) take the cube root to get the number of atoms per meter, = 4495309334 atoms/m
5) take the reciprocal to get the diameter of an atom, = 2.2245e-10 m/atom
6) find the mass of one atom (kg/mol * mol/atoms) = 9.7974e-26 kg/atom

Young's Modulus: Y=(F/A)/(dL/L)

1) F=mg = (45kg)(9.8N/kg) = 441 N
2) A = (0.0018m)^2 = 3.5344e-6 m^2
3) dL = 0.0016m
4) L = 2.44m
5) Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2

Interatomic Spring Stiffness: Ks,i = dY

1) From above, diameter of one atom = 2.2245e-10 m
2) From above, Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2
3) Ks,i = 40.799 N/m (not rounding in my actual calculations)

Speed of Sound: v = ωd

1) ω = √(Ks,i / m,a)
2) From above, Ks,i = 40.799 N/m
3) From above, m,a = 9.7974e-26 kg
4) ω=2.0406e13 N/m*kg
5) From above, d=2.2245e-10 m
6) v=ωd = 4539 m/s (not rounding in actual calculations)

Time Elapsed:

1) length sound traveled = L+dL = 2.44166 m
2) From above, speed of sound = 4539 m/s
3) T = (L+dL)/v = 0.000537505 s
which is not the correct answer.

Thank you for reading and for your feedback,

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of sound is the square root of the ratio of the elastic modulus to density.
##v=\sqrt{\frac{Y}{\rho}}##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jhyrman
jhyrman said:

Homework Statement


From WebAssign:
One mole of nickel (6.02e23 atoms) has a mass of 59 g, and its density is 8.9 g/cm3. You have a bar of nickel 2.44 m long, with a square cross section, 1.8 mm on a side. You hang the rod vertically and attach a 45 kg mass to the bottom, and you observe that the bar becomes 1.6 mm longer. Next you remove the 45 kg mass, place the rod horizontally, and strike one end with a hammer. How much time T will elapse before a microphone at the other end of the bar will detect a disturbance? (Assume a simple cubic lattice for nickel.)

Homework Equations


Young's modulus, diameter of an atom, v=ωd

The Attempt at a Solution


tl;dr - I'm getting 0.000538 seconds, not the right answer.

Atomic Size and Mass:

1) convert given density to kg/m^3 = 8900kg/m^3
2) convert to moles/m^3 (kg/m^3 * mol/kg) = 150847 mol/m^3 (not rounding in my actual calculations)
3) convert to atoms/m^3 (6.022^23 atoms/mol) = 9.084e28 atoms/m^3
4) take the cube root to get the number of atoms per meter, = 4495309334 atoms/m
5) take the reciprocal to get the diameter of an atom, = 2.2245e-10 m/atom
6) find the mass of one atom (kg/mol * mol/atoms) = 9.7974e-26 kg/atom

Young's Modulus: Y=(F/A)/(dL/L)

1) F=mg = (45kg)(9.8N/kg) = 441 N
2) A = (0.0018m)^2 = 3.5344e-6 m^2
3) dL = 0.0016m
4) L = 2.44m
5) Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2

Interatomic Spring Stiffness: Ks,i = dY

1) From above, diameter of one atom = 2.2245e-10 m
2) From above, Y = 1.834e11 N/m^2
3) Ks,i = 40.799 N/m (not rounding in my actual calculations)

Speed of Sound: v = ωd

1) ω = √(Ks,i / m,a)
2) From above, Ks,i = 40.799 N/m
3) From above, m,a = 9.7974e-26 kg
4) ω=2.0406e13 N/m*kg
5) From above, d=2.2245e-10 m
6) v=ωd = 4539 m/s (not rounding in actual calculations)

Time Elapsed:

1) length sound traveled = L+dL = 2.44166 m
2) From above, speed of sound = 4539 m/s
3) T = (L+dL)/v = 0.000537505 s
which is not the correct answer.

Thank you for reading and for your feedback,

Josh

The nickel bar has the 45 kg weight removed from the end and is laid flat before being struck.

Why do you include the change in length due to this weight (which is no longer present) in the calculation of the time it takes for sound to travel thru the rod?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jhyrman and PietKuip
Thank you PietKuip, that does make it a lot easier. I still get the same result.

SteamKing, I tried it with and without. After rounding to correct sig figs, the result is the same so I know that's not the problem. I wasn't sure how elastic metal is, but I suppose it would go back to it's original length after the weight is removed.
 
jhyrman said:
SteamKing, I tried it with and without. After rounding to correct sig figs, the result is the same so I know that's not the problem. I wasn't sure how elastic metal is, but I suppose it would go back to it's original length after the weight is removed.

Yes, it is reasonable to assume that the bar will return to its original length once the weight is removed.
 
Thank you for your help. I found the problem in my math calculating Young's modulus. I corrected that and it finally got the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K