Speed of Sound Waves: Echoes in a Canyon

AI Thread Summary
A cowboy fires a shot between two cliffs and hears three echoes, with the second echo arriving 1.92 seconds after the first and 1.47 seconds before the third. The speed of sound is given as 340 m/s, and the problem requires calculating the distance between the cliffs and the timing of a potential fourth echo. The discussion emphasizes the need to analyze the echoes based on their paths, with the first echo reflecting off the closer cliff and the second off the farther cliff. Participants suggest writing expressions for the travel times of each echo and considering the differences in timing to solve for the distances involved. The conversation highlights the importance of diagramming the sound paths to clarify the calculations.
mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cowboy stands on horizontal ground between two parallel vertical cliffs. He is not midway between the cliffs. He fires a shot and hears it echoes. The second echo arrives 1.92s after the first and 1.47s before the third. Consider only the sound traveling parallel to the ground and reflecting from the cliffs. Take the speed of sound as 340 m/s. What is the distance between the cliffs? If he could hear a fourth echo, how long after the third echo does it arrive?


Homework Equations


I was thinking that I could just try multiplying 340m/s by 1.92s, but this isn't correct. I thought it has something to do with the fact that he isn't standing in the center of the two cliffs. Since this didn't work I am now stumped how to get started.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Attack it step by step. Name all the variables: Distance to closer cliff = d1; further cliff = d2. Write expressions for the time it takes to hear all three echoes. Then apply the given info.
 
OK I have been trying to come up with an expression for time, but I'm having trouble. Would it just be: t1= \frac{340}{d<sub>1</sub>} t2= \frac{340}{d<sub>2</sub>}?
 
mickellowery said:
OK I have been trying to come up with an expression for time, but I'm having trouble. Would it just be: t1= \frac{340}{d<sub>1</sub>} t2= \frac{340}{d<sub>2</sub>}?
What's the total distance the sound has to travel?

(FYI: Don't use 'sub' tags within Latex. Use d_1 and d_2 instead.)
 
OK so it's d1+d2= (340)t1+(340)t2?
 
mickellowery said:
OK so it's d1+d2= (340)t1+(340)t2?
No. Just consider the first echo, which bounces off the near cliff. What total distance does that sound travel? Use that distance to calculate the time for that echo's arrival.

Then do the same for the second and third echoes.
 
I think what I'm having trouble seeing is whether or not all of these echoes are bouncing off of the closer wall. I see that it should be 2d_1= 340t_1 but then would it be 2d_1= 340t_2?
 
mickellowery said:
I think what I'm having trouble seeing is whether or not all of these echoes are bouncing off of the closer wall.
They don't all bounce off the closer wall. The first one does, but the second one bounces off the far wall.
I see that it should be 2d_1= 340t_1
Right.
but then would it be 2d_1= 340t_2?
No, the second echo has nothing to do with the near wall.

Draw a diagram and trace the path of each echo.

(What about that third echo?)
 
OK so the first echo which has no time attached to it will be off the close wall and the second echo which is 1.92s is off the far wall. The third echo which is 1.47s should be off the close wall again.
 
  • #10
mickellowery said:
OK so the first echo which has no time attached to it will be off the close wall and the second echo which is 1.92s is off the far wall. The third echo which is 1.47s should be off the close wall again.
Correct for the first two echoes. Note that those times are really differences in times, not what we're calling t1, t2, t3.

What's the complete path of that third echo? How far does that sound travel?
 
  • #11
Alright I think I've got it Doc. Would the second one be 2d2= 340(1.92+t1 ? I'm still thinking about the third one a little, but would it have bounced off both walls?
 
  • #12
mickellowery said:
Would the second one be 2d2= 340(1.92+t1 ?
Sounds good to me.
I'm still thinking about the third one a little, but would it have bounced off both walls?
Exactly.

Tip: Don't think you have to combine these times in your head. I would first write expressions for all three times, and then worry about the time differences. For example:
t1 = 2d1/v
t2 = 2d2/v

Then you can add that t2 - t1 = 1.92, and so on.
 
  • #13
Excellent! Thanks so much for all your help again Doc. You're my hero!
 
Back
Top