B Speed vs. time for our Galaxy and an Observer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of relative motion on time perception, using a hypothetical scenario where the Earth and solar system move at 1,000,000 mph. It emphasizes that in a specific frame of reference, one could appear stationary while moving at the same speed in the opposite direction. However, this perspective is arbitrary, as motion is relative and varies across different frames of reference. Observers in different frames will perceive time differently, with each party seeing the other's clocks as ticking slower. Ultimately, the conversation illustrates the symmetry of time dilation in relative motion scenarios.
zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour. If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all. How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zuz said:
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour. If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all. How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
Yes, there is a frame of reference such that if the solar system were moving at N mph in one direction and you were moving at N mph in the opposite direction IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM'S FRAME OF REFERENCE you would be stationary in the first FOR. So what? That's how motion works.

EDIT: If you mean that the solar system and you are moving in the SAME frame of reference then your statement that you would not be moving makes no sense, as that is NOT how motion works.
 
phinds said:
That's how motion works.
There is also this (tongue-in-cheek) theorem

Theorem
The center of mass of the Universe is at absolute rest.
Proof (reductio ad absurdum)
If it moved, where would it go?"
 
zuz said:
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour.
You're just picking an arbitrary frame of reference here, but ok.
zuz said:
If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all.
No, you'd be stationary in the frame of reference you chose arbitrarily earlier. In all other frames you're moving.
zuz said:
How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
Just the same as always. Your clocks look normal to you and everyone else's (well, those in motion relative to you) tick slow. Everyone else says their clocks look normal and yours tick slow. It's symmetric. No, that's not a contradiction.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top