B Speed vs. time for our Galaxy and an Observer

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of relative motion on time perception, using a hypothetical scenario where the Earth and solar system move at 1,000,000 mph. It emphasizes that in a specific frame of reference, one could appear stationary while moving at the same speed in the opposite direction. However, this perspective is arbitrary, as motion is relative and varies across different frames of reference. Observers in different frames will perceive time differently, with each party seeing the other's clocks as ticking slower. Ultimately, the conversation illustrates the symmetry of time dilation in relative motion scenarios.
zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour. If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all. How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zuz said:
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour. If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all. How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
Yes, there is a frame of reference such that if the solar system were moving at N mph in one direction and you were moving at N mph in the opposite direction IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM'S FRAME OF REFERENCE you would be stationary in the first FOR. So what? That's how motion works.

EDIT: If you mean that the solar system and you are moving in the SAME frame of reference then your statement that you would not be moving makes no sense, as that is NOT how motion works.
 
phinds said:
That's how motion works.
There is also this (tongue-in-cheek) theorem

Theorem
The center of mass of the Universe is at absolute rest.
Proof (reductio ad absurdum)
If it moved, where would it go?"
 
zuz said:
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour.
You're just picking an arbitrary frame of reference here, but ok.
zuz said:
If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all.
No, you'd be stationary in the frame of reference you chose arbitrarily earlier. In all other frames you're moving.
zuz said:
How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
Just the same as always. Your clocks look normal to you and everyone else's (well, those in motion relative to you) tick slow. Everyone else says their clocks look normal and yours tick slow. It's symmetric. No, that's not a contradiction.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K