Sphere Boundaries: Does a Sphere Have Any?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary Sphere
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A sphere, defined as the set of all points in 3D space equidistant from a given point, is a surface with no boundaries. This concept is critical in the context of the Divergence Theorem and Stokes' Theorem, where the surface integral of a sphere cannot be converted to a path integral due to the absence of edges. In contrast, surfaces like flat planes or wavy shapes possess boundaries, which can be visualized using a sheet of paper or a partially formed bubble. The discussion clarifies that while a sphere has no boundaries as a surface, it does have a boundary when considered as a volume in the context of the Divergence Theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Divergence Theorem and Stokes' Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of 3D geometry and surfaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of boundaries in mathematical contexts
  • Ability to visualize geometric shapes and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Divergence Theorem in detail, focusing on its applications in vector calculus
  • Explore Stokes' Theorem and its relationship with surface integrals
  • Learn about the properties of closed surfaces and their boundaries
  • Investigate the mathematical definitions of spheres and balls, including their differences
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and geometry, as well as anyone interested in understanding the properties of surfaces and their boundaries in higher dimensions.

physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
Hi, we are doing the Divergence Theorem/Stokes' theorem and the teacher said a sphere has no boundaries...what does this mean? Help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is how I see it:

Strictly speaking, a sphere is the set of all points in 3D space equidistant from a given point. That set of points defines a surface. So a sphere is a surface, a 2D object in 3D space. What do we mean when we say it has no boundaries? Well, one way of looking at it is that if you are a 2D lifeform confined to live on this sphere, your "world" would have no edges. It would just seem to continue on and on. If that's not making it clear, let's consider, in contrast, 2D surfaces that DO have boundaries:

Any surface that is not infinite in extent and not closed, for example part of a flat plane, or even an arbitrary wavy surface, can have a boundary. You can simulate these surfaces using a sheet of paper, if that helps you visualise it. Your 2D lifeform can reach the "edge" of this surface and walk around that edge. So that edge is the boundary. Begin to bring the four ends of the paper together, and what are you doing? Shrinking your boundary. Turning the surface into a closed surface. To visualise a surface that is "partway there", think about blowing bubbles. Your soapy fluid is stretched across the circular opening like a thin film. You blow into it and it balloons outward. But it is not fully formed yet. It is a "not completely closed sphere". The partially formed bubble is the surface. The circular frame coincides with the boundary of that surface (the edge). As the bubble detaches, that hole closes up. The boundary shrinks to a point, and disappears. The bubble is a fully-closed sphere.
 
Your teacher must have meant that in the context of Stokes' theorem and not of the divergence theorem.

If you consider the surface of the sphere, then this surface has no boundaries, like cepheid illustrated. So you can't make use of Stokes' theorem to go from the surface integral to a path integral over its boundary (it has none!)

In the context of the divergence theorem, then the boundary of the sphere considered as a volume* is of course the sphere considered as surface**. And so you can apply the divergence theorem.



*A full sphere is really called a ball, see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sphere.html.

**The surface of the sphere is what is actually called a sphere.
 
Thank you, guys. Your explanations are so much better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K