Can the Spherical Coordinate Integral be Simplified using a Substitution?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double integral in spherical coordinates, specifically the integral of the reciprocal of the distance between two points within a sphere. Participants are exploring the complexities of setting up and simplifying this integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the integral's setup, questioning how the distance between points affects the integration process. There are attempts to simplify the integral by considering the dependence on the distance from the origin and the angles involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and suggestions for approaching the integral, including focusing on the independence of certain variables and using substitutions. However, there remains uncertainty about the setup and execution of the integral, with no clear consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integral's complexity arises from the dependence of the distance on both variables and the angles involved, leading to concerns about the messiness of the calculations. There is also mention of needing to show work for further assistance.

vincentchan
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
My professor said this problem is straightforward in spherical coordinates,

\int_{|\vec{r_1}|\leq a } \int_{|\vec{r_2}|\leq a } \frac{1}{|\vec{r_1}-\vec{r_2}|} d^3 r_2d^3r_1

i set up the integral in spherical coordinate and found it really ugly...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what this double integral means. The inner one is the integral over all points inside a sphere of the reciprocal of the distance between each point and a given point, r1. It's clear that this value will depend only on the distance from the origin of r1, so you might as well place it on the \theta=0 axis. Once you get the inner integral into the form of a function of r1 (which will have no \theta or \phi dependance), the outer integral should be pretty easy.
 
thank you for your quick reply, i don't think i can do this because the distance is depend on both r1 and r2 (not the origin to r1).

EDIT:
the angle between r1 and r2 will make the whole thing very messy
 
Yes, but I'm saying the angle of r1 won't matter in the inner integral because you're integrating over every point in the sphere. You'll get a value that only depends on the distance of r1 from the origin.

Also, you'll still have a rough integral to do over r2. A couple hints: Do the theta integral first, and when you get an expression that involves the square roots of perfect squares, make sure you take the positive root, which may mean you'll have to split up the integral into two ranges.

EDIT: The answer I get is: 32/15 pi^2 a^5
 
Last edited:
okay, I follow your way and find the first integral is 2 pi a^2, which is independent of r1... surely i did somthing wrong...

BTW, your answer is right
 
Well I can't help you if you don't show me some of your work. How did you set up the first integral? Use the law of cosinesfor the distance.
 
this is how my integral look like

\int \frac{ r_2^2sin \theta dr_2 d \theta d \phi }{\sqrt{r_1^2+r_2^2-2r_1r_2cos \theta }}
 
That looks right. Try using the substitution u=r_1^2+r_2^2-2r_1r_2 cos \theta to do the integral over theta first.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K