Graduate Spherical Harmonics: A Primer on Barton's Relations & Addition Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the mathematical foundations of spherical harmonics, specifically Barton's relations and the addition theorem. The key relation derived is the addition theorem for spherical harmonics, expressed as ∑_{m=-l}^{m=l}Y_{lm}^*(Ω')Y_{lm}(Ω)=(2l+1/4π) P_l(⟨r⟩⋅⟨r'⟩). Participants explore the derivation of this relation, emphasizing the closure property of spherical harmonics and the geometric interpretation of the angle χ between vectors in spherical coordinates. The discussion also clarifies the conditions under which the associated Legendre polynomials P_l^m(1) yield specific values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Spherical Harmonics and their properties
  • Legendre Polynomials and their definitions
  • Vector representation in spherical coordinates
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics related to angular momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the addition theorem for spherical harmonics in detail
  • Explore the properties of associated Legendre polynomials, particularly P_l^m(x)
  • Learn about the representation theory of rotation groups and its application to spherical harmonics
  • Investigate the geometric interpretations of angles in spherical coordinates and their implications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics or mathematical physics, particularly those interested in spherical harmonics and their applications in various fields such as quantum mechanics and computational physics.

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
Hello.
I was recently reading Barton's book.
I reached the part where he proved that in spherical polar coordinates
##δ(\vec r - \vec r')=1/r^2δ(r-r')δ(cosθ-cosθ')δ(φ-φ')##
##=1/r^2δ(r-r')δ(\Omega -\Omega')##
Then he said that the most fruitful presentation of ##δ(\Omega-\Omega')## stems from the closure property of the spherical harmonics ##Y_{lm}(\Omega)## which constitute a complete orthonormal set over the surface of the unit sphere.
Then he said that the spherical harmonics satisfies the remarkable addition theorem:
##\sum_{m=-l}^{m=l}Y_{lm}^*(\Omega')Y_{lm}(\Omega)=(2l+1/4π) P_l(\vec r \cdot \vec r')##

My problem is that I didn't get from where he obtained this relation.
Besides he said that the angle##\chi## between ##\vec r## and ##\vec r'## is

##cos\chi=\vec r \cdot \vec r'={cosθcosθ'+sinθsinθ'cos(Φ-Φ')}##
Where the vector where ##\vec r## and ##\vec r'## are two vectors in spherical coordinates.

If somebody can help me obtaining this relation too.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
amjad-sh said:
##cos\chi=\vec r \cdot \vec r'={cosθcosθ'+sinθsinθ'cos(Φ-Φ')}##
At least this relation is easy to derive from the representation of the unit vector r in terms of the anlges ##\theta## and ##\phi##,
##r=(\cos \phi \sin \theta, \sin \phi \sin \theta, \cos \theta)^T## and the addition theorems for the cosine and sine of ##\phi##.
 
amjad-sh said:
∑m=lm=−lY∗lm(Ω′)Ylm(Ω)=(2l+1/4π)Pl(⃗r⋅⃗r′)∑m=−lm=lYlm∗(Ω′)Ylm(Ω)=(2l+1/4π)Pl(r→⋅r→′)\sum_{m=-l}^{m=l}Y_{lm}^*(\Omega')Y_{lm}(\Omega)=(2l+1/4π) P_l(\vec r \cdot \vec r')
I think this is easierst to prove noting that the lhs is invariant under rotations. Hence we may rotate ## r \to (0,0,1)^T## and ##r' \to (\sin(\theta), 0, \cos(\theta))^T##, with ##r\cdot r' =\cos(\theta)##. Can you fill in the remaining steps?
 
DrDu said:
Can you fill in the remaining steps?
Not exactly.
I still didn't get the figure yet.
##Y_{lm}(θ,φ)=(-1)^m\sqrt{(2l+1/4π)(l-m)!/(l+m)!}P_l^m(cosθ)e^{(imφ)}## is the joint eigen function of ##\hat L^2 and \hat L_z##
should I use this to obtain it?
 
amjad-sh said:
Not exactly.
I still didn't get the figure yet.
##Y_{lm}(θ,φ)=(-1)^m\sqrt{(2l+1/4π)(l-m)!/(l+m)!}P_l^m(cosθ)e^{(imφ)}## is the joint eigen function of ##\hat L^2 and \hat L_z##
should I use this to obtain it?
Yes. What is the value of ##P_l^m(1)##?
 
Last edited:
DrDu said:
Yes. What is the value of Pml(1)Plm(1)P_l^m(1)?
its value is zero since ##P_l^m(x)=(1-x^2)^{|m|/2}\frac {d^{|m|}}{dx^{|m|}}P_l(x)##
where ##p_l(x)=1/(2^l l! )\frac {d^l}{dx^l}(x^2-1)^l##
 
amjad-sh said:
its value is zero since ##P_l^m(x)=(1-x^2)^{|m|/2}\frac {d^{|m|}}{dx^{|m|}}P_l(x)##
where ##p_l(x)=1/(2^l l! )\frac {d^l}{dx^l}(x^2-1)^l##
Thats not always true.
 
DrDu said:
Thats not always true.
when it is not?
 
Start to check for the lowest values of l an m.
 
  • #10
DrDu said:
Start to check for the lowest values of l an m.
I found that they are equal to 1 only when m=0 and by this ##P_l^m(1)=1## If I substitute in ##\sum_{m=-l}^{m=l}Y_l^m(\Omega')^*Y_l^m(\Omega)## what I will get is ##(2l+1)/4π P_l^2(1)## which is equal to ##2l+1/4π##.

you said that the l's are invariant under rotation.I think because ## \hat L^2## commutes with ##\hat H##, ##[\hat H,\hat L^2]=0##
you mean choosing any ##\vec r## ,##\vec r'## suffices in proving the whole relation?
but if you chose other ##\vec r## and ##\vec r'## the relation will end up with ##P_l^2(\vec r \cdot \vec r')## and not ##P_l(\vec r \cdot \vec r')## isn't this true?
and why it is ##P_l(\vec r \cdot \vec r')## and not ##P_l(cosθ)## as the solution of the legendre differential equation is ##\Theta_{lm}(θ)=c_{lm}P_l^m(cosθ)##?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
amjad-sh said:
I found that they are equal to 1 only when m=0 and by this ##P_l^m(1)=1##
... and 0 if m not equal 0.

If I substitute in ##\sum_{m=-l}^{m=l}Y_l^m(\Omega')^*Y_l^m(\Omega)## what I will get is ##(2l+1)/4π P_l^2(1)## which is equal to ##2l+1/4π##.
No, be carefull! If ##\cos \theta =1##, ##\cos \theta' <1## in general.
 
  • Like
Likes amjad-sh
  • #12
DrDu said:
No, be carefull! If cosθ=1cos⁡θ=1\cos \theta =1, cosθ′<1cos⁡θ′<1\cos \theta'

OK. So the relation will end up like this:##(2l+1)/4πP_l^0(cosθ')##.
How can I reach ##P_l(\vec r \cdot \vec r')## now?
 
  • #13
Note that the Ylm span an irreducible and unitary representation of the rotation group, i.e. ## Y_l^m(R^{-1} r)=\sum_m U_{m m'} Y_l^m'(r)##, where R is a 3x3 rotation matrix and U a (2l+1)x(2l+1) unitary matrix. You can use this to show that ##\sum_{m=-l}^{l} Y^{m*}_l(r') Y^m_l(r)=\sum_{m=-l}^{l} Y^{m*}_l(e') Y^m_l(e_z)##, where ##e_z= (0,0,1)^T## and ##e'=(\sin(\arccos(r\cdot r')), 0, r\cdot r')^T##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K