Spherical Harmonics/Angular Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter atomicpedals
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Spherical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
atomicpedals
Messages
202
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Given that Lz(x+iy)m=m[itex]\hbar[/itex](x+iy)m. Show that L+=(x+iy)m.

2. The attempt at a solution

I'm probably grasping at straws here, but when I see the expression for Lz I instantly go to Lz|lm>=m[itex]\hbar[/itex]|lm>. This then leads me to suspect that |lm>=(x+iy)m. Is this correct, and how on Earth does it get me any closer to what I want to show for the raising operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not exactly. What [itex]\hat{L}_z(x+iy)^m=\hbar m(x+iy)^m[/itex] tells you is that [itex](x+iy)^m \propto \langle x,y | l~m \rangle[/itex]. You need to keep the distinction between kets and the representation of the ket in some basis. Writing [itex](x+iy)^m = |l~m\rangle[/itex] is, at best, a terrible abuse of notation.

I have no idea what [itex]\hat{L}_+ = (x+iy)^m[/itex] is supposed to mean.