Spherical shell of charge / electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of calculating the potential energy of a spherical shell of charge in relation to an electron. The author explores different methods of integration to derive potential energy, ultimately questioning why the calculations imply that an electron's charge is effectively doubled in the equations. They express confusion over the physical interpretation of an electron's charge being exerted on itself, suggesting that the model treats the charge as both centralized and distributed. The author notes that as more particles are considered, the approximation for mass becomes less accurate, leading to further uncertainty about the underlying physics. The inquiry seeks clarification on these concepts and their implications for understanding electron behavior.
Zaphodx57x
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem understanding this problem which references this exercise .

I tried it a couple different ways. I used
\begin{multline*}<br /> \Delta U(Potential Energy) = Uf - Ui = Uf - U(r = infinity) = Uf - 0 \\<br /> dU = Uf = -W = \int F * ds = \int E * Q * ds \\<br /> Uf = -\int E * Q * dr = -\int \frac{kqQ}{r^2} = \frac{kqQ}{r}<br /> \end{multline*}
I also tried using the bare potential energy equation and using two arbitrary surface areas (dA) on opposite sides of the sphere with a distance between charges of 2r , then integrating each over just half of the sphere, which provided the same result.
The problem I have is that this result gives me a pretty decent result for the mass of an electron if I assume that q = Q = charge of an electron. But this assumption seems to say that the electron is pushing against itself by its full charge.
That is a force \frac{QQ}{r^2} is present instead of a \frac {(Q)(q}{r^2} where q = \frac {Q}{n} or some other fractional or modified charge.
This almost makes sense to me in that if a sphere were to have a charge spread evenly over its surface and its radius is infinity, it still acts as if it has all its charge at its center and therefore would resist a decreasing radius of like charge.

If anyone can find a way to explain why this problem makes sense I would really appreciate it. I just don't understand how the Potential energy can contain the electron's charge twice, when there is only one charge to begin with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just don't understand how the Potential energy can contain the electron's charge twice, when there is only one charge to begin with.

there is a potential from one electron to BOTH other electrons
 
If you keep increasing the amount of particles that the electron is composed of, the approximation for mass gets worse. Going to two particles and then eventually one gives you a better approximation, but the concept behind how it works physically eludes me. Its as if the electron focuses all its charge at its center and simultaneously has the same charge spread out over the shell of charge.

Perhaps the cute mathematical answer is just an ends to a means, and the accumulation of potential energy from the radius decreasing from infinity to r just happens to simplify to a very concise answer. Anybody have any ideas?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top